Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Shawangunk Formation Conglomerate

conglomerate

That's a slab of the Shawangunk Formation conglomerate, from eastern Pennsylvania. I collected it a couple of years ago when I drove up to go fossil hunting at the Whaleback, but it wasn't until last year that I slabbed and polished it. (The slab measures 10 cm wide by 27 cm in length.) Then a couple of months to get around to scanning it, and finally a few months more before posting it. Sheesh.

It's a lovely quartz-rich clast-supported conglomerate, a ridge former in the Valley & Ridge province of the Appalachians. Like the Massanutten Formation, it's Silurian in age, and thought to be part of the "molasse" sequence shed off the Taconian mountain belt, first raised during the late Ordovician. It is interpreted as a relatively-high-energy fluvial system deposit; sediments laid down by rivers as the mountains next door were weathered and eroded.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Sideling Hill field trip

Today I took a group of students to Sideling Hill, a syncline in western Maryland. Here are a few photos from the trip. All photos by my iPhone, via Facebook (which is why the quality is lower than my usual standards):

The group all kitted out at the Sideling Hill Visitor's Center (which was closed due to budget cuts in Maryland):


Jared points out fast-weathering shale layers betwixt slower-weathering sandstone layers:


Diamictite outcrop on the far western side of Sideling Hill:


More diamictite... enigmatic sediments...


In the parking lot of a gas station, we saw some nice siltstone with plumose structure:


Lovely plumose structure:


Man, it's a long drive out there and back in one day! We also stopped at Sandy Mile Road, at the outcrop of brachiopod-fossil-bearing Oriskany Sandstone there. Good to be back home...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Basins, discussed!

First off, I'd like to say a big "Thank you!" to everyone who joined in the basins discussion yesterday after my post comparing depositional basins and structural basins. I haven't had a post generate that level of chewy discussion in a while, and it pleases me to see folks chiming in.

So here's some additional thoughts: yes, structural basins are big synforms wherein the bedding dips in all directions towards the center of the structure. They are the opposite of structural domes. It seemed that this was a sticking point with several readers, who weren't familiar with "structural basin" used in this way. Chris indicated that the term "structural basin" isn't part of structural geology vocabulary in the U.K., and in many ways I agree with him when he says, "calling a structure which was never a site of sediment deposition a 'basin' seems rather silly to me." But that is what our textbooks and lab manuals refer to them as... That's why students get confused, and that was my motivation to draw the graphic delineating the differences. (I didn't invent this term! Ed appears to back me up on this.)

Suvrat called attention to the erosion that I included as part of my structural basin "model," and while that's not necessary for a structural basin to be called a structural basin, I included it to show that there was no basin-like topography necessarily involved. And that word, topography, is likely critical to the discussion. Shame on me for not mentioning it yesterday. (Ed mentioned that's how he distinguishes the two.) Here's the way structural domes and basins are expressed in the second edition of Steve Marshak's textbook Earth: Portrait of a Planet (reproduced here with his permission):

domes_vs_basins
In the uppermost part of the image, you have both topographic and stuctural domes and basins. In the central part of the image, you see erosion-gutted (and differentially eroded) structural domes and basins that are not topographically basinal or domal. Brian asked an excellent question after yesterday's post, which was "where's a good example of a structural basin?" I didn't know of any great ones offhand, so I Googled it, and as it turns out, Wikipedia has a list on their page about "structural basins." (Tragically, the fourth hit on that same search turned up yesterday's blog post! I hate it when that happens.)

And this brings us to the most interesting part of the discussions: Lockwood was the first to say it: "Basins can be both, can't they? i.e., a structural basin can become a locus of deposition." Ah, yes! As my friend John Weidner likes to say about simple geological explanations, "Actually, it's more complicated than that." Are there depositional and structural basins? "Yes...."

"...but actually, it's more complicated than that."

The reality is that many basins are both structural and depositional. I hinted at this yesterday, when I said "[Depositional basins] can also self-perpetuate, as the heavy sediment keeps the crust sagging downward at that location." But I didn't launch into a full-blown discussion then because I was mainly interested in generating crisp thinking in my students: understanding that the term "basin" gets used (at least in our textbooks) to mean two different things, which have similar patterns but independent means of generation. Yes, the reality is that crustal sagging creating a lowspot is itself a structural phenomenon, which then has sediment accumulate atop it, which can encourage through its weight additional sagging, and additional sediment accumulation, and so on. Howard pointed this out in yesterday's comments. The layers at the bottom of such a "hybrid basin" will be structurally deformed at the same time sediment is being deposited at the top of the stack in the resulting topographic low.

So, really, what I outlined yesterday are end-members of a spectrum:
Basins_spectrum

Reality has shades of gray! Yesterday's post was about the "black and white." Today, we discuss the spectrum in between.

How can we tell them apart? The classic test of whether a basin represents a sag in the crust and a hence a paleo-crustal downward flexure is to look at the thickness of the sedimentary layers. If they thin towards the edge and thicken towards the middle, then you've likely got some topographical low, and hence elements of a depositional basin. In contrast, a purely structural downwarp in the strata will not necessarily show any such changes in bedding thickness across the structural basin; so you'll see uniform thickness across (so much as such a thing exists):

Basins_x_section

Many basins have aspects of both of these -- sometimes they look structural further down and depositional higher up. The lower half of the Marshak illustration above is a map that shows the various basins and domes of the Midwest U.S. (Sometimes the domes are called 'arches' in they're more elliptical in outcrop than circular.) So are these regional-scale basins depositional or structural? Or both? Both, pretty much. These basins do show bedding thickness changes over time, and as I understand it, those times of increasing crustal flexure have been tied to the various episodes of Paleozoic mountain-building on the east coast. The Cincinnati Arch, for example, appears to have developed by the Devonian, since the layers older than the Devonian appear to be uniform in thickness across Ohio, but the Devonian sequence is thinner atop the arch and thickens to the southeast. (I'm no expert on Midwest geology; if someone cares to clarify and/or enlighten, please do!)

Eric made another excellent point: that sometimes we refer to the volume of sedimentary rock that was deposited in a depositional basin as a sedimentary basin. Hence the volume of sedimentary rock comprising the tortured strata of the Valley & Ridge province is sometimes referred to as the Appalachian Basin: not because it's either a depositional or structural basin today, but because it was a depositional basin in the past, before it got folded and faulted. Interestingly, the Marshak map also shows a non-folded, non-faulted Appalachian Basin northwest of the Valley & Ridge province. Hmm. You mean there's one term that geologists apply to two different things?

"No! Say it ain't so!"

Howard asked about the basins of the Basin & Range province. In my parlance, those would be strictly depositional basins -- structurally controlled, yes, but by brittle faults rather than crustal downwarping. They are sites of sedimentary accumulation, but do not show any kind of synformal structure. Thus, they don't qualify as "structural basins." Tricky business! ...Yes, they're basins; yes, they're structurally controlled. But they don't meet the definition for "structural basin."

And lastly, both Eric and Howard noted that there's yet another kind of basin: a drainage basin, a topographical feature through which runoff is collected, essentially synonymous with "watershed." To summarize the difference between a drainage basin and a depositional basin, consider this: a topographical basin which is primarily the site of erosion would be a drainage basin. A topographical basin which is primarily the site of deposition would be a depositional basin. Can a single topographical basin host both erosion and deposition? Definitely! Consider the Mississippi River drainage: eroding in the high country headwaters, depositing in the lowlands nearer the mouth of the river.

Thanks again for all the thoughtful comments, folks.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Pyrolusite dendrites

Yesterday, I took a little tour out along old Route 55 through West Virginia, the road that was replaced by new Route 55, also a source of cool outcrops. My host was Maitland S., a retired gentleman who occasionally takes geology classes at NOVA. We saw a bunch of cool stuff out there, and I'll share it all with you.

First, check out these lovely pyrolusite dendrites:

dendrites1

dendrites2

Pyrolusite is MnO2, and often grows in these beautiful branching forms. It's totally an inorganic process, but the visual similarity to botanical branching makes pyrolusite dendrites a particularly insidious form of pseudofossil. Here, it's growing on limestone, presumably the Devonian Helderberg Group -- though I'll have to check on that to be sure.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, April 24, 2009

Structure trip 4: Route 55 redux

When I visited the exposures along newly-minted New Route 55 in West Virginia in March, I was so impressed, I decided to bring my structural geology students there on our trip. Now, after two stops in the Blue Ridge and a late afternoon anticlinorama, we woke, broke camp, and ate some great eggs and sausage (mine were swimming in coffee due to an accident with the French Press, but hey -- it all goes the same place, right Ben?) and set off to the west.

Hanging Rock Anticline roadcut:


Hanging Rock Anticline as viewed from the valley of the Lost River, where Old Route 55 wends and winds:


Ben, Dave, and Joe on the berm (note the thrust fault above their heads):


Plenty of primary structures to be seen here, too, like these trace fossils:


A hand-sample of trace-fossils (Arthrophycus, I think):


...or this beauty:


Small reverse fault with an offset of ~1 meter:


Here's a fossil (??) that I don't understand and cannot identify. I saw four of these out there. Can anyone (Tom, ReBecca?) help me identify this sucker and understand how it formed?










We moved on down the road a bit, to this lovely monocline (Jim & Jay for scale):


John, Karine, & Ryan take a closer look at primary and secondary structures in these strata:


Lovely flute casts:


Plumose structure #1:


Plumose structure #2:


Paleo-river channels incised into these strata (at the time of their deposition):


Reduction "halo" around a carbonaceous plant fragment fossil:


Ripple marks:


More plant fossils (these were the largest I saw):


Lots of carbon films of shredded up plant chunks:


Ball & pillow / flame structures:


Ditto, and note the graded bedding in the upper sandstone layer, too:


Great trip, everyone! Thanks!

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Structure trip 3: Anticline Land!

Now that we've visited a couple of stops in the Blue Ridge province, it was was time for my Structural Geology class to head out to the Valley & Ridge province.

We made a brief stop to be introduced to the Massanutten Sandstone (Silurian quartz sandstone to quartzite) at Blue Hole, where we noticed this fault zone:


...But the main show was up in Veach Gap, where there's a zillion parasitic folds on the larger Massanutten Synclinorium. This was our third Field Study Area. The anticlines are beautifully expressed in human-sized outcrops, while the intervening synclines are lost in the subsurface:














In spite of this profound deformation, there are still some primary structures to be seen, like these Arthrophycus (?) trace fossils...


...and these external molds of articulate brachiopods:


As you might be able to deduce from the angle of light in these photographs, we hit this site late in the day, and then went back to camp at a site Dave knew of, by a lovely creek. Jim and Joe cooked us an amazing dinner of pasta and meatballs, and we hung out by the campfire a bit before bed. Sleep, and then up and at 'em the next morning to move on to our final Field Study Area... (more on that tomorrow)

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Structure trip 1: Garth Run high-strain zone

I took my Structural Geology students on a three-day field trip this weekend to examine outcrops in the Blue Ridge and Valley & Ridge geologic provinces. Here's a few photos of the team at our first (of four) field study areas, the Garth Run high-strain zone:

Examining the structure and taking strikes and dips:






Fabric elements cross-cutting one another:


Mylonitic fabric:


Foliation wrapping around a feldspar porphyroclast:


This is kind of interesting: a big pancake (oblate ellipsoid) of blue quartz, with a potassium feldspar in the middle:


And if you zoom in close, you can see that the feldspar porphyroclast is broken in the middle (along the plane of cleavage) with non-blue quartz filling in the gaps:


I think this blue quartz likely formed in the pressure shadow of the resistant feldspar porphyroclast during flattening strain, and eventually that feldspar began to brittlely deform, extending in the direction of minimum principal stress.

Quite a bit of variation across strike:


The students found some nice euhedral garnets too, though this was a block of float from upstream, and not intimately associated with the high-strain zone itself:


More tomorrow, from Field Study Area #2...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Route 55, West Virginia

Yesterday, four Honors students and I went out to West Virginia's route 55 (between Wardensville and Moorefield), to look at some sedimentary strata and associated tectonic structures. Our guide was my friend David Dantzler, an enthusiastic amateur geologist. Here's a map of the terrain we traversed:



As you can see, this is part of the Valley & Ridge province, an area of the country defined by Paleozoic rocks that were folded and thrust-faulted during the Alleghenian phase of Appalachian mountain-building. Recently, a new road has been constructed traversing these valleys and ridges. It's a bit of a boondoggle, a pet project of West Virginia senator Robert Byrd which funneled federal dollars into the Mountain State, ostensibly to make it easier for the chicken farmers of Moorefield to get their birdie bits to market on the east coast.

This image ought to give you a sense of the project's scale (big bridge), and how much use it gets (no one on the bridge):
Route_55_07

But the U.S. taxpayer's loss is the geologist's gain... There are some pretty spectacular new exposures of Valley & Ridge rocks along the new route 55. Here's the NOVA van parked at an outcrop of Tuscarora Sandstone that is arched up into a broad anticline. Again, notice how few people are driving on route 55 here:
Route_55_08

Ooh, look: heavy traffic!
Route_55_06

Contact between the lower Tuscarora Sandstone (a Silurian-aged extremely pure quartz sandstone, variably fused to quartzite), and the overlying (darker-colored) formation, which is either the Rose Hill Formation or the Mackenzie Formation at this location:
Route_55_05

We found oodles of cool trace fossils:

Route_55_04

Route_55_03

Route_55_02

But it wasn't just sedimentary layers. There were also some cool tectonic structures, like this joint in the Tuscarora, showing a beautifully developed hackle fringe:

Route_55_01

Here's some "pencil cleavage" where fine-grained shale develops cleavage that intersects the planes of fissility, causing it to fracture in long slivers:

Route_55_12

I slammed on the brakes for this one: an awesome anticline...
Route_55_10

I forced David and the students to act out the orientation of the bedding planes at this anticline:
Route_55_11

Honors student Jason points out a small thrust fault in the outcrop above him: You can see the offset in a greenish/gray shale layer:
Route_55_09

In case it wasn't obvious above, here's a zoomed-in shot, with the offset layer highlighted (the miracles of Photoshop!) and the fault labeled:
IMG_0359_labelled

We all had a grand day outside, and the rain held off until our return trip, which was pretty great. Thanks to David for showing us these rocks, and thanks to my students for being smart and inquisitive and into field trips.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 13, 2009

Dawn of field trip season

It's getting to be springtime... and that means field trips!

My first field trip of the semester is tomorrow: my friend David Dantzler has organized a trip to look at stratigraphy and structure out on a new highway in West Virginia. I'm supplying half a dozen Honors students and a NOVA minivan, but David's handling the content. And of course, I'll be on hand to comment on "teachable moments." Looking forward to it.

Other trips upcoming this semester: Billy Goat Trail (x4!), Massanutten Mountain, Old Rag Mountain, Washington DC walking tour, and a weekend-long structural geology trip to the Blue Ridge and Valley & Ridge provinces. I love field trips; really they were the aspect of majoring in geology that appealed to me the most - the fascination with Earth processes took longer to develop.

See you in the field!

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

New folds in the Massanutten Sandstone

Yesterday I mentioned finding a new (to me) outcrop of the Martinsburg Formation's graded beds (turbidite sequences shed off the late-Ordovician Taconian Orogeny here on the east coast of North America). Today, I'd like to share a few images of where John Graves and I went next: up into the heart of the Massanutten Synclinorium, the Fort Valley. To remind you of the relationship between the Shenandoah and Fort Valleys, here's a Google Map I've posted before:



There, defining the ridges of Massanutten Mountain (and thereby separating the lower Shenandoah Valley from the upper Fort Valley) is the Massanutten Sandstone, a Silurian-aged quartz sandstone (in some places it's a quartz-pebble conglomerate) that is correlated to the Tuscarora Sandstone further west in the Appalachian Mountains' Valley & Ridge province.

The Massanutten can show some nice primary structures, including some of the oldest known terrestrial plant fossils (preserved as fragmentary carbon films) and cross-bedding like this:

Massa_Syn_16

With regard to the cross-bedding, note that this is "reverse" cross-bedding, which records shifts in current direction over time. At the bottom of the sample, the current was flowing from left to right, and at the middle and top of the sample, it was flowing in the opposite direction, right to left. This sample shows well the distinctive shape of cross-beds: they are tangential to the main bed at the bottom, but are often truncated on top, making them superb geopetal indicators. (They tell you whether your rock is right-side-up or up-side-down.)

I took John on a hike up the Veatch Gap trail, because I wanted to show him the awesome anticline in the Massanutten Sandstone that NOVA adjunct geology instructor Chris Khourey and I had found on a reconnaissance trip out there in May of last year. John and I took a "group shot" with the fold:

Massa_Syn_10

And here's John showing those Montanans that we do actually have some cool geology out on the east coast:

Massa_Syn_11

So, what's going on here? Well... the Valley & Ridge province of the mid-Atlantic region is defined by folded (and thrust-faulted) sedimentary strata. These folds were produced about 300 to 250 million years ago, during the Alleghenian phase of Appalachian mountain-building. The tectonic cause of this deformation is interpreted to be North America's collision with Africa, closing the Iapetus Ocean and completing the assembly of the supercontinent Pangea.

More locally, the Shenandoah Valley and Massanutten Mountain are structurally underlain by a great fold, the Massanutten Synclinorium. Synclinoria are different from mere synclines because they are more complicated: the overall synclinal shape is "decorated" with numerous smaller anticlines and synclines. It's a big trough-like shape, but wrinkles are "parasitic" on the main fold. So, even within the big "canoe" shape of the Massanutten Synclinorium, there are little bulges and wrinkles that go the opposite direction. This anticline is one of them.

At that point, having seen the anticline, we weighed whether to keep hiking or not.

We opted to press on... and I'm so glad we did. ... Twenty feet further down the trail, we saw another two anticlines!

Massa_Syn_14

At its base, this one had a small cave I could crawl into:

Massa_Syn_13

And: a short distance further we found a hiker's shelter with an apt name:

Massa_Syn_15

Ha! I love it.

More tomorrow, when I'll revisit the issue of plumose structure and hackle fringes.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

New outcrops in the Massanutten Synclinorium

Yesterday, I mentioned what my MSSE advisor John Graves and I saw along the Billy Goat Trail on Saturday afternoon. Today, I'd like to share some images and insights from our Sunday field trip, out to the Shenandoah Valley and the Massanutten Synclinorium which underlies it.

I would like to thank Rick Diecchio of George Mason University for sharing some key outcrop knowledge with me. I've found that information about good outcrops can be very difficult to obtain unless you know somebody who knows. The information is primarily passed on through the oral tradition, rather than written in sufficient detail in peer-reviewed literature or in field guides (...or posted on geoblogs?).

Anyhow, back in December, on our drive down to the Blue Ridge / Valley & Ridge Symposium in Charlottesville, I told Rick I was organizing a new Massanutten Synclinorium field course. It's a place he's very familar with. He recommended a good outcrop to see the turbidite sequences of the Martinsburg Formation, a late Ordovician clastic unit made of debris shed off the rising Taconian Mountains to the east. Rick drew me a map in my field notebook, and on Sunday I was finally able to schedule a visit. Since John is unfamiliar with the stratigraphy and structure of the Shenandoah Valley (or the east coast in general), we also stopped at a lot of the other stops I'll be taking students to, including the classic "Tumbling Run" section.

Today I'd like to share a sets of photos with you from this new (to me) outcrop of the Martinsburg Formation. Tomorrow I will share another set from the next layer up in the stratigraphic stack, the Massanutten Sandstone. Both outcrops a pleasing combination of sedimentary stratification and structural geology.

Here's the Martinsburg Formation outcrop, just west of the Shenandoah River's North Fork:
Massa_Syn_09

This, like the "Pet Store Anticline" that I have previously blogged about, is an excellent place to look at bedding/cleavage relationships. The beds are dipping east, but the cleavage dips steeply to the west, implying the outcrop's position within a much larger (kilometers-wide) cleavage fan.

Here's a eye-catching outcrop that shows the beds weathered out differentially, while pervasively cut by ~vertical metamorphic cleavage:
Massa_Syn_01

More beds, of alternating sand and mud, steeply dipping in the Massanutten Synclinorium:
Massa_Syn_06
Note how the muddier portions show cleavage development better than the sandier strata.

More pervasively-cleaved muddy layers:
Massa_Syn_07

Here's one that confused me. In this predominantly-sandstone layer, you can see that the cleavage is better developed on the right, lower side of the bed. Does this mean that the right, lower-side of the bed is more mud-rich? (and sand-poor?) It did appear to be finer grained. If so, does this imply this bed is upside-down? Ordinarily, I would have thought to only look for the primary sedimentary structure as a geopetal (right-side-up) indicator, but this is the first time it has occurred to me that structural susceptibility based on mineralogy (in this case, susceptibility to cleavage development) could be used as an indicator of younging direction. I should note that this particular photo was taken downhill of the main outcrop, and may well be overturned. It's a synclinorium, after all, not a smooth syncline!
Massa_Syn_03

In this photo, the turbidite sequences of the Martinsburg Formation show a cool feature, a primary sedimentary structure known as cross-bedding:
Massa_Syn_05B
Note that this photo is taken with the photo's long axis ~parallel to bedding, but the reality of the outcrop is that this is all steeply dipping, rotated 90 degrees clockwise (see the inset for "true" outcrop orientation).

...But wait! There's stuff dipping to the left, and stuff dipping to the right! Which one is this purported cross-bedding? Try this labelled version to sort it all out:
Massa_Syn_05A
Note how at the bottom, the cross-beds curve tangentially to subparallelism with the main bed. They are truncated at top by the overlying layers. This is a good geopetal indicator, and the photo is oriented in depositional position, with the top at the top. Furthermore, if you reconstruct the current direction from these cross-beds (after the strata have been "unfolded" and restored to their original horizontal orientation, it would have come from the east... that is, from the orogen itself (the roots of which are exposed along the Billy Goat Trail.)

The intersection of rock weaknesses along the planes of bedding and planes of cleavage can result in the rock fracturing into long pencil-like bits, a phenomenon known as "pencil cleavage." This is my Freddy Krueger impersonation using the Martinsburg's cleaved "pencils."
Massa_Syn_02

John puts his hand up to give a sense of scale to the axis of this small fold in the steeply-dipping strata:
Massa_Syn_08

I was all agog over this outcrop, really digging the relationship between the structure and sedimentological elements in the rock. Best of all, it's a very short drive from Tumbling Run, and will replace the hike to the Buzzard Rock outcrop in my Massanutten field trip in April. (For NOVA-area readers, there are still four spaces open in that class...)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 18, 2009

The origins of West Virginia

Strange Maps has an interesting piece up today about where West Virginia came from (as a state): turns out it was all about the Civil War. The accompanying map shows the original proposed name for West Virginia, "Kanawha," as well as a proposed demarcation between Virginia and Maryland that trended along the western margin of the Blue Ridge physiographic province. If this boundary had come to pass, Virginia would have gotten the Valley & Ridge province, but Maryland would have retained the Blue Ridge, Piedmont and Coastal Plain.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Valley & Ridge, Water Breakout Sessions

Yesterday, I mentioned the results of the Virginia DGMR symposium's breakout session on Blue Ridge geology. Today, for completeness' sake, I'll also post the results of the other two breakout sessions (one on the Valley and Ridge province, and one on water issues):

Session 2: Unresolved Issues in Valley and Ridge Geology
In general, the consensus was that continued support for detailed geologic mapping is needed, which provides essential information for a number of major issues that need to be resolved. Major issues discussed during the Breakout Session generally fell into one or more (much overlap) of the following categories:

Geologic Framework:
Need to find better ways to communicate the value of geologic mapping (e.g. beyond the anticipated development along the I-81 Corridor).
Better communication between geologists working in the BR and VR regarding the timing and influence of major tectonic events; presently somewhat disconnected.
Evaluate the influence of basement normal faults.
Better understanding of the sequencing of thrust faults in the VR.
Better understanding of the transition between brittle and ductile fracturing in the VR.
Influence of the Rome Trough on VR structural framework.
Better understand the link between Allegheny Front and BR overthrust.
Better define stratigraphic units with economic and geohazard potential that are currently lumped (e.g. SDu, Ols, etc).
More focus on deep stratigraphy, where there is potential for deep saline aquifers that may provide geologic storage of CO2.

Geologic Hazards:
Identify, evaluate, and prioritize geologic hazards in VR.
Karst/sinkhole digital database; better understanding of the interplay between geologic controls and land use.
Large block slides, recognizing risk areas.
Better understand the nature of brittle on ductile fractures in context of subsidence risk along the western margin of the Blue Ridge
Quaternary history (e.g. evaluation of flood risks)

Economic:
Better understand the distribution of high-Ca limestones; not just limited to the middle-Ordovician units.
Stratigraphic relationships between Devonian shale units (e.g. Millboro, Marcellus)
Evaluate occurrences and distribution of non-polishing aggregate resources.
Evaluate occurrences and distribution of high purity silica (glass sands); (e.g. depositional character of the Oriskany).

Other:
Source and structural implications of Eocene-age igneous rocks (Highland Co) and alkaline dikes (Augusta Co).
Need for improved educational outreach.

Session 3: Integrating Geologic and Hydrologic studies - Benefits and Challenges
The group was divided into geologic information providers, hydrologic information providers, and hydrogeologic information users. The provider groups developed a list of the most important types of information they provide. The User group developed a list of the most important types of information they need. Based on the results of this exercise and the interest of the group, the remainder of the meeting focused on addressing gaps in available information for end users.

Geologic data providers provide:
Geologic formation information - descriptions, structure data, "cover" materials
Fracture/joint data and analysis
Detailed and regional maps
Ground truth on karst features

Hydrologic data providers provide:
Well data - location, yield, logs, geochemistry
Spring data - location, discharge, geochemistry, dye trace results
Water use information - ground water and surface water
Technical /Assistance
Hydrographs

Users of hydrogeologic information need:
Geologic maps at an appropriate scale.
Water well data - yield, depth to water table, etc.
Hydrographs

Users noted the following characteristics of information would be helpful:
Widely available and accessible information (Internet)
Standardized - uniformity of format and methodology (example pumping tests) on at least a statewide basis
Geologic descriptions and maps could include a characterization of saprolite.

Providers and users believed there was good agreement between the type of information that is being provided and that which is needed. The clear problem was recognized to be a lack of data in many places and the lack of easily accessible information (digital format, available on internet)
To address this problem, it was suggested the users of hydrogeologic information may be able to provide some assistance, such as:
Well data - construction characteristics, yield, drawdown, geochemistry over time
Soil data - maps, field notes
GIS Capabilities and data processing - especially county governments.

An identified issue:
Disconnect in some cases between geologists and soil scientists

Next Steps:
Water for America initiative may be an opportunity for geologic and hydrologic data providers to work together at the state level and provide hydrogeologic information to end users.

Based on USGS efforts in Northern Shenandoah Valley, integrated studies have both benefits and challenges. A future meeting to highlight these may be helpful to state level geologists and hydrologists.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, December 19, 2008

Geolutions for 2009

Christie asks: What are your top ten geological resolutions for the new year?


For me, the list would include:
  1. visiting the Galapagos Islands
  2. visiting the high Andes (Cotopaxi, Chimborazo), Ecuador
  3. finding a cool outcrop of graded beds in the Martinsburg Formation (late Ordovician turbidites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia) that Rick Diecchio told me about last week
  4. "walking on the Moho" in Gros Morne National Park, Newfoundland (late summer)
  5. seeing Snowball rocks and Ediacarans on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland (late summer)
  6. visiting Egg Mountain paleontological site, Montana
  7. joining my colleague Ken Rasmussen's field trip to the Culpeper Basin, a Triassic rift valley in northern Virginia
  8. some cool trip next winter break (2009-10): perhaps Patagonia? Or Antarctica?
I've also got some big teaching resolutions:
  1. Running a successful and robust Structural Geology course for George Mason University (spring semester).
  2. Running a successful and innovation Environmental Geology course for NOVA (spring semester).
  3. Running a successful and safe Regional Field Geology of the Northern Rocky Mountains course for NOVA (summer semester).
  4. Preparing and running a successful and groundbreaking Honors Historical Geology course linked with English Literature 242 at NOVA, where the English professor and I will bridge the two subjects with readings of Lyell, Darwin, "A Pair of Blue Eyes," and others (fall semester).

On other topics:

  1. Finish my M.S.S.E. degree (July)
  2. Buy a house
  3. Put together a series of geology 'vodcasts' on local geology
  4. Write a few freelance articles
  5. Publish one cartoon per month in EARTH
  6. Prepping (cutting and polishing) a backlog of rock samples from all over the place
  7. Successfully moving the geology department into our new building

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 15, 2008

DGMR Symposium report

I spent this past Friday (12/12) at a symposium put on by the Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources, in Charlottesville, Virginia. This excellent branch of our state government just had their budget disproportionately slashed, but they aren't letting it bring them down. In fact, they're breaking new ground in their unparalleled service to the geological public. In honor of the groundbreaking Virginia geologist Tom Gathright (who was in attendance), they organized a day of scholarship and conversation about recent advances in the geology of the Blue Ridge and Valley & Ridge physiographic provinces.

Rick Diecchio (of George Mason University) and I drove down together, getting up at the unholy hour of 5am in order to get there on time. Once there, we trundled past their excellent outdoor rock garden (about which I will post tomorrow), and inside to join the gaggle of more than a hundred geologists from the USGS, Virginia universities and community colleges, transportation agencies, environmental agencies, and the DGMR itself.

The morning session consisted of a series of talks about the Blue Ridge. We heard from Bob Millici (USGS), Scott Southworth (USGS), Chuck Bailey (W&M), Mark Carter (DGMR), Bill Henika (Virginia Tech), and Karen Rice (USGS). I won't post any of the juicy data details we heard, for fear of spilling any unpublished beans, but there was some cool stuff we learned about. There was also a poster session in the well-appointed library. Pete Berquist (Thomas Nelson Community College) and I had lunch out in the rock garden, where I chatted with three undergrads from our alma mater.

The afternoon session was given over the the Valley & Ridge province. We heard from Scott Eaton (JMU), Steve Whitmeyer (JMU), Dave Weary (USGS), Randy Orndorff (USGS), Joel Maynard (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality), and Wil Orndorff (Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage).

My favorite part of the day, though was a break-out session to discuss unresolved issues. There were three break-out groups: one for water issues, one for the Valley & Ridge, and one for the Blue Ridge. I went to the Blue Ridge one, and really enjoyed this unique setting. I mean, here I am in a room with a bunch of people who spend the majority of their professional time trying to understand how the Blue Ridge got put together, and we're just brainstorming together, thinking about big unknowns, big gaps in our understanding. The DGMR staff is compiling these results, and once they're distributed out to the participants, I'll post them here on NOVA Geoblog. We've been asked to share the results. Since there were two geobloggers in the room (me and Chuck), we reckoned that's a quick way to disseminate some of our ideas.

I'd like to thank the DGMR for putting on such a great meeting, in particular during such lean and uncertain times. The day was positive, affirming, and valuable on many levels. Readers, remember that you (yes, you) can still write to the governor and other state officials to protest the crippling 75% reduction in the DGMR staff.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Random sedimentary rock photos

I've already posted some images from the VCCS Science Peer Conference a week and a half ago. Outside the offices of the Wintergreen Nature Foundation, they've arranged a series of large charismatic rock samples from the region. Some of them are from the Blue Ridge (where Wintergreen is located) and some are from adjacent physiographic provinces. These samples are from the Valley and Ridge province, showing some cool features sometimes found in sedimentary rocks.

First, some articulate brachiopod fossils in quartz sandstone (internal/external molds). This wasn't labelled as to its source formation, but it looks a lot like the Oriskany Sandstone, a major ridge-former in the Valley and Ridge. Quarter for scale.
brachiopod_external_molds_display_wintergreen_small

Second, a breccia in limestone. (FYI, Andrew's Oakland Geology blog has another nice image of breccia today.) Perhaps a collapse breccia? Again, the sample wasn't labelled, so I have no idea which formation it was derived from. The white in-filling is calcite. Quarter for scale.
collapse_breccia_limestone_display_wintergreen_small

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, November 9, 2008

VCCS Science Peer Conference

The Virginia Community College System (VCCS) organizes conferences occasionally where faculty in different disciplines can get together. This weekend was the "peer conference" for the natural and physical sciences. It was held at the lovely mountain resort called Wintergreen, in central Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains.

Here's a map of the area:

That's the Shenandoah Valley on the left (part of the Valley & Ridge province), the Blue Ridge in the middle (running from NE to SW), and the Piedmont province on the far right. Wintergreen is a bit SW of Charlottesville.

The conference was fruitful and interesting. I enjoyed getting to meet a bunch of the other VCCS geology faculty and discussing what we want to do in the future in terms of supporting one another and professional development. I gave a talk about new technologies in geology instruction, which included information about the geoblogosphere and other sundry web resources I use. My colleague Erik Burtis at NOVA-Woodbridge led us on a cool "field trip" to Glacial Lake Missoula, via Google Earth.

I spent a lot of time talking with Pete Berquist, from Thomas Nelson Community College, discussing next summer's Regional Field Geology of the Northern Rocky Mountains course. We laid out a series of goals for the students, and created a tentative itinerary. Pete and I took a great hike at the end of the first day, poking around in the rocks and watching the sun set over those gorgeous mountains. Friday evening, there was a cool astronomy session, where Ed Murphy from UVA showed us the Ring Nebula, the Andromeda Galaxy, and assorted other stuff in outer space. He had a great laser pointer that extended a green laser line up about 80 feet into the sky... Very useful for pointing things out. Low light levels in the forested mountains meant excellent stargazing. Saturday morning, Bill Warren of Lord Fairfax Community College gave a good talk about the global energy crisis, and potential solutions. I picked up a few good resources there that I'll use next semester in teaching Environmental Geology. And then when the conference concluded, there was a geology "hike" out to look over the landscape. By driving us to a couple of different overlooks, Doug Coleman of the Wintergreen Nature Foundation showed us spots where we were able to look east into the Piedmont, and west into the Valley & Ridge. Pretty cool, though we didn't look too closely at the actual rocks exposed there. Fortunately, I have an inclination to do that on my own... as you'll see below:

Catoctin Formation greenstone (meta-basalt), showing chlorite-rich portions (left) and epidote-rich portions (right). Quarter for scale.
WINTERGREEN_1

More Catoctin, the volcanic breccia layer. Lots o' epidote. Quarter for scale.
WINTERGREEN_3

Is this a quartz vein or a granite dike? WINTERGREEN_2
At first glance, it appears to be your standard hydrothermal quartz vein full of milky quartz, but then you'll notice that it's not just quartz. There are also two crystals of orthoclase feldspar in there. (The dark shapes are just empty holes & shadow, not mafic minerals.) I pointed this phenomenon out before, but I'll state it again: I think that hydrothermal quartz veins and granite dikes are not separate phenomena, but points along a spectrum of composition. Quarter for scale.

Looking southeast towards the Piedmont:
WINTERGREEN_4

Looking northwest towards the Valley & Ridge:
WINTERGREEN_5

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Grade this graded bed (UPDATED)

...So let me ask you something, especially you sedimentary geologists...

This is a sample of the Martinsburg Formation, a clastic unit shed off the Taconian Orogeny and into the adjacent basin. It's exposed in the modern-day Shenandoah Valley, where it overlies Ordovician carbonates, and is overlain by the Silurian Massanutten Sandstone (which is correlative to the Tuscarora Formation). It's essentially a graywacke, showing rhythmic bedding traditionally interpreted as turbidite deposits. I collected this sample in the Shenandoah Valley a year and a half ago, on a camping trip with my family.

Then I put it on the NOVA rock saw and sliced it in half. This chunk went to my dad's back yard, where I ground it down and polished it up. The result is a decent look at the internal structure of the unit (you can click on it for higher resolution):
martinsburg_gr_bed

Note the pretty uniform weathering rind wrapping around the whole thing, like crust on a loaf of bread.

UPDATE: Woe is me; I forgot to include a sense of scale. The sample measures about 10 cm (~4 inches) on a side.

Here's the thing that gets me... While this portion ('upper' 2/3 of the sample) shows a clear fining-'upwards' sequence....
martinsburg_gr_bed_top

...this portion of the sample (lower 1/3) appears to show a coarsening-'upward' sequence:
martinsburg_gr_bed_bottom

In other words, in this 'graded bed,' the coarsest grains appear about 1/3 to 1/2 of the way 'up,' from 'bottom' to 'top'... What gives? This isn't part of the traditional Bouma sequence, is it? How does a bed like this form?

I'd appreciate any enlightenment you can offer.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Natural Bridge, Virginia

On the way back up from the VGFC this weekend, we briefly detoured off the interstate (81) to go up Route 11, and across a singular natural feature in Virginia: Natural Bridge. This is a span of limestone going over a creek (and because it spans a watercourse, it is thus not an arch, but a bridge).

Unfortunately, this is all we saw of it:
Natural Bridge sign

The bridge is privately owned, and it's fenced off from view from Route 11, in spite of the fact that the road actually goes over the bridge. So we drove across it, but we couldn't really tell. And we didn't feel like stopping and paying the $$ to get in to see it from underneath.

In spite of that disappointment, what's pretty cool about the area is that it shows up well in this Google Maps "terrain" view:


Kind of wild: a natural bridge that's actually used as a bridge...

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Virginia Geological Field Conference 2008

Yesterday, I mentioned that the main point of this weekend's field trip was to attend the Virginia Geological Field Conference in Marion, Virginia.

We arrived on Friday night at Hungry Mother State Park, and got some background information and logistical direction from the trip's leaders and the various officers of the VGFC. We also got some sobering news about how Virginia budget cuts will affect the Division of Geology and Mineral Resources... but more on that tomorrow.

On Saturday morning, we headed out to examine the geology of the Pulaski and Saltville thrust blocks, two of the slices of Paleozoic sediments that got shoved bodily northwestward during the Alleghenian phase of Appalachian mountain-building. The point of the trip was to examine the structure and stratigraphy of these two thrust sheets, in an attempt to compare and contrast them. Both are an example of "thin-skinned" tectonics, where sedimentary strata are deformed (folded/faulted), but they are disconnected from the tougher underlying "basement" rocks (the crystalline rocks of the North American continent beneath). Sliding along a big basal fault called a decollement, these sheets of sedimentary rocks created the northwestern fringe of the Appalachian mountain belt; a zone called the "fold and thrust belt." (This is in contrast to the "thick-skinned" style of deformation exemplified by the Blue Ridge province immediately to the east, in which the basement rock is itself deformed, and shoved up on top of these younger sedimentary strata.)

Here's two of the three field trip leaders: Loren Raymond (holding map) and Bill Whitlock (talking into the microphone), giving us relevant details for our first field stop:
vgfc_01

Fred Webb (the third trip leader) used the same technique of large graphics as an aid in explaining the local geology. Here, he explores the geology of Saltville, VA, from a scenic overlook:
vgfc_05

Here's Fred and Loren using another visual prop to illuminate the distribution of sediment types (Knox dolomite versus Moshiem limestone) on a farm in the Rich Valley:
vgfc_08
Does anyone else out there use large visual aides like these on field trips? I think it's a pretty good idea.

There were a lot of people who attended the conference: over 120! Here's the crowd at the Saltville Overlook stop:
vgfc_06

...and the throngs of geologists shutting down traffic on the way to another stop:
vgfc_07

...and still more geologists all over the right-of-way at our final stop of the day:
vgfc_15
Kudos to the trip organizers for coming up with a coherent way of running the trip with so many participants!

So why were we there? ...To look at these deformed sedimentary strata, and increase our understanding of the deformation mechanisms that accomodated strain during Appalachian mountain-building. Here's a look at the Max Meadows tectonic breccia, a zone of crumbled rock at the base of the Pulaski Fault:
vgfc_03

Just above the breccia, the rock is still pretty deformed. Here's some intense folding and boudinage in dolostone & shale layers:
vgfc_02

At another location, Honors student Hope W. shows a fault in the Nolichucky limestone:
hope_fault

In other places, folds were the main variety of strain observed in the rocks. Here, we see this in the Honaker dolomite (with elbow for scale):
fold_elbow

Ditto for this exposure of the (Cambrian) Nolichucky limestone (enthusiastic caver for scale):
vgfc_11

After a superb lunch put on by a church group, we strolled out in some karstic fields in the Rich Valley. Here, several field trip participants drop down into a sinkhole:
vgfc_10

I was interested to see that there were a lot of Mississippian-aged evaporite deposits in this corner of Virginia. Saltville's salt was from the Maccrady Formation, as is this gypsum (note fingernail scratch mark):
vgfc_14

Here's the spectacular final outcrop of the day, where we looked at deformation within the Cambrian-aged Nolichucky and Honaker Formations, as well as the Mississippian-aged Maccrady Formation they override at this location on the Saltville Thrust Fault:
vgfc_12

Of note to you environmental types out there: Saltville was not only the "salt capital of the Conferderacy," but it was also the site of the very first Superfund site (due to dumping of mercury as a byproduct of soda ash + chlorine production).
saltville

And I'll just conclude the photo section of the post with a couple of photos of cool spiders we saw. Each of these arachnids is a good three inches in length (including legs):
vgfc_13
I think the upper one is a 'garden spider.' The bottom one is silver! I've never seen a silver spider before...
vgfc_09

All in all, it was a good day in the field. We returned pleasantly tired and hungry, and had dinner at the Hungry Mother State Park "The Restaurant". Over food, we discussed the pros and cons of field trips like this, and slept well that night.

I was particularly pleased to meet up with and hang out with folks like Cy Galvin (part of my pre-GSW dinner group), Jon Tso (Radford University), Pete Berquist (Thomas Nelson Community College), Amy Gilmer (Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources), and Chuck Bailey (College of William and Mary). Pete, Amy, Chuck, and I are all W&M geology department alumni. Chuck mentioned the good news that he will soon be joining the geoblogosphere too -- watch this site for an announcement of his (surely to be excellent) geology blog as soon as it goes live.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, August 8, 2008

Giant Virginia stromatolite

A month ago, it was announced that there was an enormous stromatolite head discovered at a limestone quarry near Roanoke, Virginia.

It's two tons in weight, and over five feet across.

Being as I was out of town, I hadn't heard about it, but one of my Snowball Earth students alerted me to it on Wednesday evening.

Pretty cool! Read more here.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Paw Paw Bends, Maryland

Picking up where I left off yesterday, in describing Saturday's field trip out to western Maryland:

2:20pm: We exit Interstate 68 and go south on a dirt road for about ten or twelve miles. This road takes us through the Green Ridge State Forest, and I can tell the students are wary of it. I love a good dirt road, and this one even shows outcrops in the road surface -- resistant sedimentary layers tracing across its rutted, potholed surface. The sun comes out, and I roll down the window, relieved that the weather has finally broken.

3:00pm: We arrive at the C&O Canal's Paw Paw Tunnel, in Maryland just north of the Potomac River and the town of Paw Paw, West Virginia. ("Paw paw" is a native tree in the custard apple family with a lovely fruit also called a paw paw. They're delicious, if you can find one the raccoons haven't already claimed.) Paw Paw is the site of the most pronounced entrenched meanders seen along the length of the Potomac River. These exaggerated loops suggest an old age river system, but they are "locked" at the bottom of deep canyons, which suggests a young river system. The usual interpretation is that the Potomac is a rejuvenated river system: it was "old age," equilibrated to base level and meandering actively, but then base level dropped and it incised to a deeper level, maintaining the meandering shape even though the meanders no longer actively squiggle from side to side.

3:10pm: At the upstream end of the tunnel, we discuss the Brallier Shale (Devonian), and note the angle of the bedding here, which is tipped into the Canal's valley: ideal for landslides. When C&O Canal engineers came to the Paw Paw Bends, they faced a tough choice: construct the canal to parallel the river around its multiple entrenched meanders, or carve a tunnel through a mountain made of this stuff. They opted for the tunnel, saving 6.5 miles of Canal length, but the digging of the tunnel took 14 years!



Because the weather is good, we decide to hike over the mountain first and then walk through the tunnel on the return trip. The hike gives us views of some of the meanders' loopy shapes:



We don't see a whole lot else on the hike, but it feels good to stretch the legs.

4:oopm: We reach the Tunnel Hollow, a long linear valley on the downstream side of the tunnel. Signs of the morning's torrential rains are everywhere in the form of increased runoff. For instance, we see a large stream emerging from the base of a talus slope, flowing across the path and into the canal:



Heading up the Tunnel Hollow, we are greeted with the sight of numerous waterfalls arcing down into the valley:





Here, the layers of the Brallier Formation dip into the Tunnel Hollow, again presenting the potential for slip between the layers, and suddenly big slabs of rock dropping down into the valley. We note the "pins" holding these unstable sheets of rock in place:



4:20pm: My favorite thing about the Tunnel Hollow is the world class exposures of slickensides there. During Alleghenian mountain-building, these sheets of shale slid over one another, as a deck of cards will buckle when squeezed. Sliding between the layers ground grooves into the rock face, and also deposited mineral fibers alligned in the direction of sliding.





4:40pm: Lastly, we got to the downstream end of the Paw Paw Tunnel itself, where multiple waterfalls were cascading down onto the towpath. A fine mist fills the air, and catches the beams of sunlight. There's a nice anticline exposed just above the tunnel archway, and usually I have students climb up the stairs (on the left) to check it out up close. However, today a waterfall was landing on the stairs!







Four of us decided to go for it anyhow, just for the thrill of passing through a waterfall. Several (smarter) students who chose to stay down below pulled out their video cameras and recorded parts of our folly. Here's one showing the climb: (Unfortunately it's both silent and taken "sideways" and I'm not video-savvy enough to know how to fix it in either regard.)



Here's another video of the four of us (Nicole, Jan, Dave, and me) up on top:




4:35pm: Time to enter the tunnel. Flashlights come out, and we begin to walk through the Paw Paw Tunnel. It's a remarkable feat of engineering. It's 3/5 of a mile long, and pitch black. We walk along the towpath, where mules once pulled barges up and down the C&O Canal. It's nice and cool in there, like a cave.

5:10pm: We load up in the vans and depart the Paw Paw Tunnel. It takes a full two hours to drive back to Annandale, so we get rolling. We cross West Virginia, and then work our way east across Virginia. Several students nod off, while others discuss geology and travel along the way.

7:12pm: We return to the Annandale campus. Adios, estudiantes! The NSF crowd (Michelle and Nicole) and I retire to the Auld Shebeen in Fairfax for some Boddington's and Gaelic tunes. It's been a long day; we've covered a lot of ground and seen some cool stuff. Time for a pint!

As with yesterday's post, all photos are by Nicole LaDue, NSF. Thanks, Nicole!
Videos are courtesy of Amy Bertsch and Dean Kauffmann.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, June 2, 2008

Sideling Hill, Maryland

Saturday morning, 6am: I roll out of bed and check the weather. Storms forecast for Hancock, Maryland, where I'm due to be leading a field trip that day. Hmmm. But based on the radar animation, it looks like they're going to hit hard from 10-11am or so, and then ease off for a bit before hitting hard again later in the day.

6:15am: Making coffee, with Lola the cat underfoot. I check the weather again, and convince myself that the timing of the rain will work for our trip's timetable. I decide to go for it.

7:00am: I call Dale Shelton (of the Maryland Geologic Survey) at home and confirm that it's okay if we go out on the outcrop if it's merely wet, but we can't go out if it's actively raining.

7:15am: I e-mail the students, confirming that the trip is a 'go.'

8:15am: "Bye, Lola!" I leave DC and drive out to Annandale. Once on campus, I gather up a few items (first aid kit, whiteboard, topographic maps), and then go out to the parking lot where students are gathering.

9:00am: We depart campus and head northwest.

9:45am: We leave the Piedmont and cross into the Blue Ridge province.

10:03am: We leave the Blue Ridge province and cross into the Valley and Ridge province (though there are a number of Marylanders who persist in calling it the "Ridge and Valley").

10:15am: The rain hits, hard. Windshield wipers on. Behind the wheel, I grimace. Hope it passes...

10:56am: We pull in to the Sideling Hill Visitor Center. Other cars containing other students are there already. We meet up and head indoors.

Sideling Hill is a massive roadcut in western Maryland. If you've ever seen it, you'd remember it. I won't go into all the geological details here, because (due to the rain) we didn't see them all. But if you're interested, you can read in more detail about Sideling Hill on my website. Long story short: We've got some early Mississippian strata here, derived from the weathering of the Acadian highlands to the east, deposited at the edge of the Kaskaskia epeiric sea. Then they were folded up during Alleghenian mountain-building.

12:00pm: After reviewing some of the salient details inside the Visitors Center where it was warm and dry, we ventured out into the rain and wind. Fortunately, a pedestrian walkway over the highway gave us a decent vantage:





Even from this limited vantage, we are able to observe and interpret some interesting features. For instance, check out the differential weathering of the shale vs. sandstone layers here on the eastern side of the outcrop. We likened this to other examples of differential weathering, like at Monument Valley, Arizona.



We also got a good view of what an oxbow lake looks like when viewed in cross-section. Note how this paleo-channel cuts into the layers beneath it, and is filled with a plug of dark shale, indicating low-energy, low-oxygen conditions.



2:00pm: After giving up on our chances to get out on the first berm of the outcrop, we depart the Sideling Hill Visitor Center, but pull over a short distance down the road to examine the diamictite on the western side of the roadcut. In drizzle, and shouting over the traffic, we discuss the multiple origins of diamictites:



2:10pm: On the road again, headed for our second destination, the Paw Paw Bends...

(More on that tomorrow)

All photos by Nicole LaDue, NSF. Thanks, Nicole!

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

More Massnutten photos

Here's a few more photos from the recent field trip to the Massanutten Synclinorium in the northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia.

Some more Arthrophycus (?) trace fossils in the Massanutten Formation:

arthophycus

Outcrop of the Massanutten Formation on Route 678, south of Waterlick, VA. Note that the bedding is dipping to the south (reflecting the overall "canoe"-shape to the structure of the Massanutten Synclinorium... this is the "bow" of the canoe...):

massanutten_beds

Shelly horizon in the Mahantango Formation. Mainly brachiopod debris, but also crinoid columnals:

shelly_layer_mahantango

Cross-bedding in the Martinsburg Formation's Bouma sequences. This is a sample I collected on Saturday. I sawed it open on Monday, then polished it and gave it a coat of clear acrylic. Sample length is about 5 cm:

martinsburg_crossbeds_2

Ditto. As above, we can see clear cross-bedding here, reflecting current flow in these ancient turbidites:

martinsburg_crossbeds_1

Bedding / cleavage relationships expressed at an instructive outcrop in the parking lot of a pet store north of Front Royal, Virginia. Bedding is clearly visible running subhorizontally across the picture, but the rock breaks vertically: a tectonically-induced cleavage:

bedding_cleavage

You could hardly ask for a better outcrop to teach bedding / cleavage relationships. Here's a medium-sized anticline in the same outcrop (note quarter, center, for scale). It clearly displays a fan of cleavage orientations. Lovely!

bedding_cleavage_2

Lastly, on that same note, here's a sample I collected fromthat locality, with bedding planes and cleavage planes highlighted through the magic of CorelDraw. The stripes you see on the face of the sample are formed by the intersection of bedding and cleavage planes, shown schematically in red:

bedding_cleavage_3

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Massanutten Synclinorium field trip

Last week, I mentioned some cool conglomerates I saw when NOVA adjunct instructor Chris Khourey and I did some field scouting. The main purpose of that trip was not to focus on the Culpeper Basin's boundary conglomerates, however, but the "Great Valley" of Virginia's Valley and Ridge province. The "Great Valley" is usually called the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia, because the Shenandoah River flows north through it. (Topographically, it continues north into Maryland, but the Shenandoah River isn't found there.) Sitting in the middle of the valley is a mountain range, Massanutten Mountain. And in the middle of Massanutten, there is another valley, the Fort Valley. As you can see below, Massanutten is a fence-like ridge separating the higher Fort Valley from the lower Shenandoah Valley:

In fact, rumor has it that the name "Massanutten" is a native American term for "basket." This describes the overall shape of the mountain/valley quite well. It probably won't surprise you to learn that this valley-in-a-mountain-in-a-valley pattern is due to differential weathering of folded sedimentary layers. In fact, the entire Great Valley is one big downturned fold, a syncline. Actually, it's not a perfectly smooth fold -- there are some wrinkles and minor folds within the overall down-turned structure, so we call it a synclinorium. The oldest rocks are therefore at the eastern and western edges of the Great Valley, and the youngest rocks are at the center of the Massanutten Synclinorium, up in the Fort Valley. It turns out that some of these rock layers are easily eroded, and some are tough. Of particular note is the Massanutten Sandstone, a quartz-rich, well-indurated rock that is responsible for the ridges of Massanutten Mountain. It weathers away more slowly than the shales and carbonates (limestones) above and below it. Here's a cross-section view to show how the subterranean structure influences the surface topography:

The map view up above (using Google Maps' super-cool new terrain feature) and this cross-section also show the difference in landscape texture (and geologic cause) of the Blue Ridge province in the SE corner of the images.

In discussing the geology of the area, I'm going to mix my pictures from Thursday's scouting expedition with photos from Saturday's actual field trip with my Audubon class.

Let's start at the beginning. The first stop was in the Conococheague Formation, a late Cambrian limestone. Our field trip stopped at a nice exposure near Mulberry Run, west of Strasburg, VA. Here's the crew looking close at the outcrop, and trying out their geo-interpretive field skills for the first time:

audubon_group_mulberry_run

Albert tests the outcrop with some dilute hydrochloric acid. It fizzes!

acid_albert

Soon, we spot the first of several stromatolites:

stromatolite

There are also some nice spherical grains of calcite called ooids (or ooliths). These form in wave-influenced carbonate banks today, like the Bahamas.

ooids_mulberry_run

Interpretation of this environment then? Looks like a nice passive margin, far from any major terrigenous inputs (i.e. mud or sand). Warm tropical temperatures leading to the chemical precipitation of lime mud from seawater.

What comes next? On to stop #2, the Tumbling Run section* south of Strasburg, we see a nice long exposure of the New Market, Lincolnshire, and Edinburg Formations, a series of Ordovician limestones, all dipping nicely towards the axis of the synclinorium. (Last semester, one of my Honors students looked at silicified trilobites in the Edinburg Formation.) As you walk downhill (and up-section), you see a change in the limestones. They get darker in color, and they start splitting into thin sheets along clay-rich layers. Uh-oh, we're getting an increasing clastic influence on these sedimentary rocks. They no longer record pristine, Bahamas-type environments. Now the limestone is mixing with shale. Where is all that mud coming from? A hint may be found in several bentonite layers, weathered volcanic ash deposits. There's some volcanoes getting closer to the area, it looks like.

bentonite

In the late Ordovician, the east coast of North America experienced the first of three episodes of Appalchian mountain-building. Geologists infer that the Taconian Orogeny was caused by the collision of a volcanic island arc (like modern day Indonesia) with the east coast. The Tumbling Run section shows well the increasing clastic influence of the growing Taconian Mountains to the east.

It's also good for some small but interesting tectonic structures. Check out this conjugate pair of en echelon tension gash arrays:

tension_gashes

The black nodules you see along bedding in the above image are flint nodules, very characteristic of the Lincolnshire Formation. If you get close to them, you'll find that they exhibit different mechanical properties than the limestone that surrounds them. They are more likely to break (brittle behavior) than flow (ductile behavior):

strain_flint

But let's get back to the stratigraphy, shall we? (It just doesn't do to get distracted by these minor structures!) Our next stop was to look at the Oranda Formation (calcareous shale), indicating heavy clastic influence (but still a bit of carbonate). Then, after a lovely lunch at the Strasburg Emporium, we headed off to the Buzzard Rock Trail, to look at the Martinsburg Formation. The Martinsburg is a nice thick batch of fine sand and mud interpreted as turbidite deposits. Various pieces of the Bouma sequence can be seen throughout the formation, including graded beds, ripple marks, and cross-bedding. This picture conveys these alternating lithologies, representing fluctuating current strength as turbidity currents periodically brought coarser sediment into the deep (low-oxygen, as indicated by the dark color) basin.

martinsburg_sand_shale

Now, keep in mind that all these sedimentary layers later got folded during the final phase of Appalachian mountain-building, the Alleghenian ("Alleghany") Orogeny. At that same time of intense deformation, some of these mud layers began to convert to slate. The outcrop on the Buzzard Rock Trail shows this pretty well, in spite of being covered by lichen, algae, moss, and other horrible rock-obscuring growths:

martinsburg_buzzard_rock_trail_2

The sandy layers outcrop as stiff, blocky strata. But look to the right of the quarter: in the muddy layers, a penetrative cleavage has developed, subperpendicular to the compressive stress. Here, let me draw for you what I saw at this outcrop:

martinsburg_buzzard_rock

The clay minerals in the mud are more susceptible to being alligned by tectonic forces than the grains of sand in the coarser layers. So the shaley intervals exhibit a more pronounced cleavage than do the sandy intervals.

But again, I'm getting distracted by the tectonic overprinting! This trip is supposed to be about stratigraphy, pure and simple. Doggone it! Okay, moral of the Martinsburg: no more carbonate by the late Ordovician. Instead, this sedimentary basin is getting filled with clastic debris shed off the Taconian Mountains** to the east.

Next layer up is the Massanutten Formation: mainly quartz sandstone, but also some quartz pebble conglomerate. We see it by entering the "basket" via a water gap near Waterlick, VA. Driving south (uphill) along Passage Creek, we were soon surrounded by looming cliffs of quartzite. It represents fluvial and beach facies as the depositional basin was filled to the brim. Here's a boulder of the conglomeratic portion:

massanutten_conglomerate

Here's some nice cross-beds in the sandy portion exposed near Blue Hole, about 4 miles south of Waterlick, VA:

crossbeds_massanutten

Other Massanutten Formation features include some fossils. Here's some poorly-preserved brachiopod external molds:

brach_molds

And here's some Arthophycus horizontal trace fossils, probably made by polycheate worms:

arthrophycus2

Okay, I can't resist this tectonic structure: an awesome anticline exposed along the Veatch Gap Trail (eastern part of the synclinorium, where a small anticline in the Massanutten Formation is superimposed on the larger synclinal pattern):

anticline_massanutten

Beyond the Massanutten Formation, we are in the Fort Valley proper, inside the "canoe" shape of the Massanutten Mountain ridge system. Next layer up is some upper Silurian / lower Devonian carbonates, representing a return to passive margin sedimentation after the end of the Taconian Orogeny and the erosional beveling of those ancient mountains. Unfortunately, there are no good places to stop on the narrow Fort Valley Road, so I don't have a picture of them to share. Trust me, though: they're there.

The next good stops are of Devonian shales. There's some nice ones exposed across the road from Elizabeth Furnace. More mud? From whence does it come? We interpret this again as the onset of an orogeny, in this case the Devonian-aged Acadian Orogeny, which dumped a big thick wedge of sediment into the Appalachian Basin. Here's a shot of the Needmore Formation, one of these shales with distinctive trace fossils highlighted by iron oxide:

Needmore Formation

The overlying Mahantango Formation (Devonian) is a siltstone that bears a decent number of body fossils, like these brachiopods:

fossils

Here's something that may be the back of a trilobite (if I'm not imagining the lobe to the left of the central line of knobs), or maybe a crinoid (if the "central" line is all there is):

trilobite?

Here's what appears to be the (vertically-oriented) trace fossil Daedalus, which I learned for the first time this spring in Silurian rocks near Buffalo, New York:

Daedalus?

Finally, at the top of the stack, near Seven Fountains, there are exposures of more bentonite, in this case the Tioga Bentontite, a major stratigraphic marker bed throughout the Appalachians. Here's a shot of the bentonite exposure on the Fort Valley Road near Seven Fountains:

tioga bentonite

Here's Chris looking at the outcrop:

tioga_outcrop

To summarize the Fort Valley portion of the story: after the Taconian Orogeny ends, we get a brief period of tectonic calm and passive margin sedimentation (carbonate), and then a return to orogenically-induced clastic sedimentation (augmented with volcanic eruptions). In the sedimentary sequence of the Massanutten Synclinorium, this records the onset of the Acadian Orogeny. The actual deformation of all these sedimentary horizons into a synclinorium shape was accomplished by the Alleghenian Orogeny: the much bigger mountian-building episode triggered with Africa and North America collided in the latest Paleozoic.

Hope you enjoyed joining us on this trip. Virginia's got some great geology, eh?

* For the Tumbling Run section, I highly recommend this excellent field guide:
Fichter, Lynn S., and Diecchio, Richard J., 1986, "The Taconic sequence in the northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia." In: Geological Society of American Centennial Field Guide - Southeastern Section, p.73-78.

** Note I don't say "Taconic." The Taconic Mountains are a modern topographic feature in New York. They exhibit Taconian rocks well, and the orogeny is named for them, but the Ordovician Taconian Mountains would have been much bigger and more areally extensive.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Diamonds in Virginia?

While toodling along the web on some other business this week, I stumbled across this publication by the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy.

I had no idea that there were any diamond finds in Virginia. But apparently there are, scattered across three different physiographic provinces!

On Thursday's excursion, Chris and I tried to find the "Front Royal Peridotite," one of seven locations mentioned in the DMME publication. It's a single dike which crosses State Road 626 southeast of Waterlick, Virginia. But to no avail! There were no outcrops visible on either side of the road, and there was a dense little cluster of houses bearing manicured lawns. Bummer. That would have been cool.

I'll try and visit a couple other localities mentioned in the report over the next year or so, and hopefully I'll find some of these igneous source rocks, though I don't hold out much hope of actual diamonds.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Treating limestone hand samples with acid

A year or so ago, I picked up this nice sample of limestone in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia (easternmost valley of the Valley and Ridge physiographic province). It was a cobble in a stream, not in situ, but it can't have come very far (by natural means anyhow) since it's quite angular. I liked it because of the alternating colors of its layers. I was not totally sure why they are different colors, but I strongly suspected it had something to do with different reactions to weathering (perhaps different calcite / aragonite ratios, or an increased silica / clay content in some layers?). I also liked the patterns of sedimentary layering, thinking back to undergraduate discussions of Flaser bedding and the like, but not remembering the details clear enough to interpret this one. Perhaps one of the sedimentary geologists can help clue me in? Still, I suspected it had something to teach me, so I brought it back to my lab at NOVA. Side view:

layered_limestone

There, I sawed it in half. Top view:

layered_lime_cut

To my chagrin, but not my surprise, the interior showed the layering less clearly. In the sawn section, I could clearly see where the weathering "front" had penetrated a short distance into the rock along the lighter-colored layers. While they were yellow-tan on the face of the sample, they were merely light gray in the interior. I decided to try and create a little weathering of my own, and reached for one of the students' acid bottles. I dropped about ten drops of acid on the sawn face, let it fizz for a bit, rinsed it off, and repeated the acid application. Almost instantly, the different layers jumped out into high contrast. The light-colored one was much more reactive than the dark colored one. Here's a view from the scanner which offers a comparison between the un-acid-treated sample (left) and the one I gave the brief acid bath to (right):

acid_no_acid

Not only does the layering jump out at you, you can see some micro-faulting too. Here's another view, from the camera, of the two samples, one stacked atop the other. I'm astonished at how 30 seconds of acid produced such a remarkable difference in their appearances:

layered_lime_acid_no_acid

As soon as I had documented the efficacy of the technique, I treated the second sample the same way as the first. One is now in the NOVA teaching collection, and the other is a proud new member of the CB office deskcrop collection.

Labels: , , ,