What're you doing on Friday? There are two excellent-sounding earth science seminars inside the Beltway: The University of Maryland Geology Department's weekly seminar, and the American Meteorological Society's monthly seminar for policy makers. Both events are free and open to the public. AMS is at 10am, UMD at 11am. You can't do both -- you must choose...

AMS: Friday, September 26, 2008New Time - 10:00 AM - 12:30 PM
Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room G50 Washington, DC

Accelerating Atmospheric CO2 Growth from Economic Activity, Carbon Intensity, and Efficiency of Natural Carbon Sinks

What is the relationship between economic activity and CO2 growth? What is carbon intensity and how does it relate to economic activity? What are the trends in CO2 growth, carbon intensity, and changes in the efficiency of natural reservoirs to store carbon? How does the growth in CO2 compare to the various estimates of CO2 growth contained in the most recent IPCC assessment of climate change? What is permafrost and what is the extent of permafrost thaw in the Arctic? Is permafrost thaw a response to global warming and if so, what is the future likely to hold? Will permafrost thaw result in the release of additional CO2 into the atmosphere from Arctic soils? If so, what is the impact likely to be on global warming? How much carbon is stored in Arctic soils? Assuming that the Arctic continues to warm well above the global average, what is the likely fate of that soil carbon and how might it influence climate in the future?

Public Invited; Buffet Reception Following

Moderator: Dr. Anthony Socci, Senior Science Fellow, American Meteorological Society

Speakers:

• Dr. Josep (Pep) Canadell, Executive Director, Global Carbon Project, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Marine and Atmospheric Research, Canberra, Australia
• Dr. Vladimir Romanovsky, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, A
• Dr. Howard E. Epstein, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Program Summary

How Fast is Atmospheric CO2 Growing and Why, and Does it Suggest Ways to Mitigate Climate Change?

The increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single largest human perturbation of the climate system. Its rate of change reflects the balance between human-driven carbon emissions and the dynamics of a number of terrestrial and ocean processes that remove or emit CO2. It is the long term evolution of this balance that will determine to a large extent the speed and magnitude of climate change and the mitigation requirements to stabilize atmospheric CO2 concentrations at any given level. Dr. Canadell will present the most recent trends in global carbon sources and sinks, updated for the first time to the year 2007, with particularly focus on major shifts occurring since 2000. Dr. Canadell’s research indicates that the underlying drivers of changes in atmospheric CO2 growth include: i) increased human-induced carbon emissions, ii) stagnation of the carbon intensity of the global economy, and iii) decreased efficiency of natural carbon sinks.

New Estimates of Carbon Storage in Arctic Soils and Implications in a Changing Environment

The Arctic represents approximately 13% of the total land area of the Earth, and arctic tundra occupies roughly 5 million square kilometers. Arctic tundra soils represent a major storage pool for dead organic carbon, largely due to cold temperatures and saturated soils in many locations that prevent its decomposition. Prior estimates of carbon stored in tundra soils range from 20-29 kg of soil organic carbon (SOC) per square meter. These estimates however, were based on data collected from only the top 20-40 cm of soil, and were sometimes extrapolated to 100 cm. It is our understanding that large quantities of SOC are stored at greater depths, through the annual freezing and thawing motion of the soils (cryoturbation), and potentially frozen in the permafrost.

Recent detailed analysis of Arctic soils by Dr. Epstein and his colleagues found that soil organic carbon values averaged 34.8 kg per square meter, representing an increase of approximately 40% over the prior estimates. Additionally, 38% of the total soil organic carbon was found in the permafrost.

A total of 98.2 gigatonnes (1015 grams) of carbon is estimated to be stored in the soils of the North American Arctic tundra. An area-based estimate for the entire Arctic suggests the presence of approximately 160 gigatonnes of carbon. The annual increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is roughly 2% of this amount, so small changes in Arctic carbon storage could have substantive impacts on atmospheric CO2. The future of this stored carbon is, however, largely uncertain in the face of a changing Arctic environment. Climate change and resulting increasing temperatures in much of the Arctic could increase the decomposition rates of soil organic carbon (producing atmospheric CO2), and increase permafrost thaw, which would expose more soil organic carbon for decomposition. On the other hand, increasing temperatures could also lead to greater sequestration of atmospheric CO2 by tundra vegetation. Actual changes will be the result of complex interactions between processes that sequester carbon and those that release it.

Past, Present and Future Changes in Permafrost and Implications for a Changing Carbon Budget

Presence of permafrost is one of the major factors that turn northern ecosystems into an efficient natural carbon sink. Moreover, a significant amount of carbon is sequestered in the upper several meters to several tens of meters of permafrost. Because of that, the appearance and disappearance of permafrost within the northern landscapes have a direct impact on the efficiency of northern ecosystems to sequester carbon in soil, both near the ground surface and in deeper soil layers. Recent changes in permafrost may potentially transform the northern ecosystems from an effective carbon sink to a significant source of carbon for the Earth’s atmosphere. Additional emissions of carbon from thawing permafrost may be in the form of CO2 or methane depending upon specific local conditions.

Dr. Romanovsky will present information on changes in terrestrial and subsea permafrost in the past during the last glacial-interglacial cycle and on the most recent trends in permafrost in the Northern Hemisphere. He will further discuss the potential impact of these changes in permafrost (including a short discussion on potential changes in methane gas clathrates) on the global carbon cycle. Dr. Romanovsky’s research suggests that permafrost in North America and Northern Eurasia shows a substantial warming during the last 20 to 30 years. The magnitude of warming varied with location, but was typically from 0.5 to 2°C at 15 meters depth. Thawing of the Little Ice Age permafrost is on-going at many locations. There are some indications that the late-Holocene permafrost started to thaw at some specific undisturbed locations in the European Northeast, in the Northwest and East Siberia, and in Alaska. Future projections of possible changes in permafrost during the current century, based on the application of calibrated permafrost models, will be also presented.

The next seminar is tentatively scheduled for October 10, 2008.
Topic: Ecosystem Health in a Rapidly Changing Climate

Please see the AMS web site for seminar summaries, presentations and future
events: http://www.ametsoc.org/seminar

For more information please contact:
Anthony D. Socci, Ph.D. Tel. (202) 737-9006, ext. 412 socci@ametsoc.org

UMD: 11:00am - 12:00pm at 1121 Computer Science Instructional Center

Internal flow and extrusion of the Greater Himalayan Slab, Mount Everest Massif: a tour of the world's highest rocks
Dr. Rick Law from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

If you are interested in meeting with Dr. Law please sign up online. You also may delete an appointment from this page. Please join the faculty and students for refreshments in the Geology Building foyer at 10:30 am.

Seminar series web page for UMD-College Park Geology.

Labels: climate change, CO2, geology, global warming, maryland, meetings

Yesterday morning, I took a jaunt with a local amateur geologist, Owen P., to go look at some outcrops in streambeds in and adjacent to Silver Spring, Maryland.

Owen wanted me to look at these surfaces, our local unconformity between foliated metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont below, and unconsolidated sediments of the basal Coastal Plain above (cell phone for scale):
The lower rocks are metagraywacke schist of the Sykesville/Laurel Formation (different aspects of the same thing, as far as I am concerned, and not worthy of two different formation names). They were metamorphosed during the Taconian ("Taconic") Orogeny, ~460 million years ago. These rocks were then eroded, and new sediments deposited on top of that eroded surface -- this is an unconformity like the ones I posted about over the past couple of days out in Wyoming and Arizona.

My host thought the layer above the unconformity might be tsunami deposits associated with the Chesapeake Bay bolide impact at 35.5 million years ago. However, that's not what I saw. Instead, the high proportion of angular quartz, and the fact that it was clast-supported rather than matrix supported, suggested to me that the upper layer was a gravel deposit from this very stream. It was good for me to see such a collection of angular clasts atop the unconformity -- on hilltops in DC, I'm used to seeing the Potomac Formation in this position. It's a Cretaceous-aged river deposit, with a real mix of sand, clay, and well-rounded (mainly quartzite) cobbles.

Another look (with cell phone for scale):


After I explained why I didn't buy the tsunamite hypothesis, but encouraged him to keep looking, Owen took me to another cool location, on Northwest Branch (a creek) just outside the Beltway at Burnt Mills Park. Here's a location map:


There, we found an outcrop of migmatitic metagraywacke very reminiscent of the one I visited on Four Mile Run in Arlington, VA, in March of this year. Cutting down, Northwest Branch has exposed a complex of clearly metasedimentary, clearly granitic, and not-so-clearly transitional migmatitic rocks. It's pretty cool, and not only because some of the potholes went all the way through the rock, making wormhole tunnels that a geologist can (and will) crawl through...


I found a couple of cool igneous contacts. Here's a dike of granite cutting through metagraywacke. I like this outcrop because it shows that these things are in fact filled-in cracks, and cracks have a propagating edge, a tip. Most granite dike exposures don't show this fracture edge, but this one does. In spite of the graffiti, it's a good look at that process caught in the act.


And here's a nice example of cross-cutting relationships. Host metagraywacke (notice the pebble-sized clasts of various lithologies in the upper left) is cut by two granite dikes: first a finer-grained, darker-colored one, and then by a coarser-grained, lighter-colored one. Beauty!


Thanks to Owen for showing me these outcrops -- I appreciate the interest and the invitation!

Labels: granite, maryland, metamorphism, migmatite, primary structures, sediment

Picking up where I left off yesterday, in describing Saturday's field trip out to western Maryland:

2:20pm: We exit Interstate 68 and go south on a dirt road for about ten or twelve miles. This road takes us through the Green Ridge State Forest, and I can tell the students are wary of it. I love a good dirt road, and this one even shows outcrops in the road surface -- resistant sedimentary layers tracing across its rutted, potholed surface. The sun comes out, and I roll down the window, relieved that the weather has finally broken.

3:00pm: We arrive at the C&O Canal's Paw Paw Tunnel, in Maryland just north of the Potomac River and the town of Paw Paw, West Virginia. ("Paw paw" is a native tree in the custard apple family with a lovely fruit also called a paw paw. They're delicious, if you can find one the raccoons haven't already claimed.) Paw Paw is the site of the most pronounced entrenched meanders seen along the length of the Potomac River. These exaggerated loops suggest an old age river system, but they are "locked" at the bottom of deep canyons, which suggests a young river system. The usual interpretation is that the Potomac is a rejuvenated river system: it was "old age," equilibrated to base level and meandering actively, but then base level dropped and it incised to a deeper level, maintaining the meandering shape even though the meanders no longer actively squiggle from side to side.

3:10pm: At the upstream end of the tunnel, we discuss the Brallier Shale (Devonian), and note the angle of the bedding here, which is tipped into the Canal's valley: ideal for landslides. When C&O Canal engineers came to the Paw Paw Bends, they faced a tough choice: construct the canal to parallel the river around its multiple entrenched meanders, or carve a tunnel through a mountain made of this stuff. They opted for the tunnel, saving 6.5 miles of Canal length, but the digging of the tunnel took 14 years!



Because the weather is good, we decide to hike over the mountain first and then walk through the tunnel on the return trip. The hike gives us views of some of the meanders' loopy shapes:



We don't see a whole lot else on the hike, but it feels good to stretch the legs.

4:oopm: We reach the Tunnel Hollow, a long linear valley on the downstream side of the tunnel. Signs of the morning's torrential rains are everywhere in the form of increased runoff. For instance, we see a large stream emerging from the base of a talus slope, flowing across the path and into the canal:



Heading up the Tunnel Hollow, we are greeted with the sight of numerous waterfalls arcing down into the valley:





Here, the layers of the Brallier Formation dip into the Tunnel Hollow, again presenting the potential for slip between the layers, and suddenly big slabs of rock dropping down into the valley. We note the "pins" holding these unstable sheets of rock in place:



4:20pm: My favorite thing about the Tunnel Hollow is the world class exposures of slickensides there. During Alleghenian mountain-building, these sheets of shale slid over one another, as a deck of cards will buckle when squeezed. Sliding between the layers ground grooves into the rock face, and also deposited mineral fibers alligned in the direction of sliding.





4:40pm: Lastly, we got to the downstream end of the Paw Paw Tunnel itself, where multiple waterfalls were cascading down onto the towpath. A fine mist fills the air, and catches the beams of sunlight. There's a nice anticline exposed just above the tunnel archway, and usually I have students climb up the stairs (on the left) to check it out up close. However, today a waterfall was landing on the stairs!







Four of us decided to go for it anyhow, just for the thrill of passing through a waterfall. Several (smarter) students who chose to stay down below pulled out their video cameras and recorded parts of our folly. Here's one showing the climb: (Unfortunately it's both silent and taken "sideways" and I'm not video-savvy enough to know how to fix it in either regard.)



Here's another video of the four of us (Nicole, Jan, Dave, and me) up on top:



4:35pm: Time to enter the tunnel. Flashlights come out, and we begin to walk through the Paw Paw Tunnel. It's a remarkable feat of engineering. It's 3/5 of a mile long, and pitch black. We walk along the towpath, where mules once pulled barges up and down the C&O Canal. It's nice and cool in there, like a cave.

5:10pm: We load up in the vans and depart the Paw Paw Tunnel. It takes a full two hours to drive back to Annandale, so we get rolling. We cross West Virginia, and then work our way east across Virginia. Several students nod off, while others discuss geology and travel along the way.

7:12pm: We return to the Annandale campus. Adios, estudiantes! The NSF crowd (Michelle and Nicole) and I retire to the Auld Shebeen in Fairfax for some Boddington's and Gaelic tunes. It's been a long day; we've covered a lot of ground and seen some cool stuff. Time for a pint!

As with yesterday's post, all photos are by Nicole LaDue, NSF. Thanks, Nicole!
Videos are courtesy of Amy Bertsch and Dean Kauffmann.

Labels: field trips, maryland, stratigraphy, structure, teaching, valley and ridge

Saturday morning, 6am: I roll out of bed and check the weather. Storms forecast for Hancock, Maryland, where I'm due to be leading a field trip that day. Hmmm. But based on the radar animation, it looks like they're going to hit hard from 10-11am or so, and then ease off for a bit before hitting hard again later in the day.

6:15am: Making coffee, with Lola the cat underfoot. I check the weather again, and convince myself that the timing of the rain will work for our trip's timetable. I decide to go for it.

7:00am: I call Dale Shelton (of the Maryland Geologic Survey) at home and confirm that it's okay if we go out on the outcrop if it's merely wet, but we can't go out if it's actively raining.

7:15am: I e-mail the students, confirming that the trip is a 'go.'

8:15am: "Bye, Lola!" I leave DC and drive out to Annandale. Once on campus, I gather up a few items (first aid kit, whiteboard, topographic maps), and then go out to the parking lot where students are gathering.

9:00am: We depart campus and head northwest.

9:45am: We leave the Piedmont and cross into the Blue Ridge province.

10:03am: We leave the Blue Ridge province and cross into the Valley and Ridge province (though there are a number of Marylanders who persist in calling it the "Ridge and Valley").

10:15am: The rain hits, hard. Windshield wipers on. Behind the wheel, I grimace. Hope it passes...

10:56am: We pull in to the Sideling Hill Visitor Center. Other cars containing other students are there already. We meet up and head indoors.

Sideling Hill is a massive roadcut in western Maryland. If you've ever seen it, you'd remember it. I won't go into all the geological details here, because (due to the rain) we didn't see them all. But if you're interested, you can read in more detail about Sideling Hill on my website. Long story short: We've got some early Mississippian strata here, derived from the weathering of the Acadian highlands to the east, deposited at the edge of the Kaskaskia epeiric sea. Then they were folded up during Alleghenian mountain-building.

12:00pm: After reviewing some of the salient details inside the Visitors Center where it was warm and dry, we ventured out into the rain and wind. Fortunately, a pedestrian walkway over the highway gave us a decent vantage:





Even from this limited vantage, we are able to observe and interpret some interesting features. For instance, check out the differential weathering of the shale vs. sandstone layers here on the eastern side of the outcrop. We likened this to other examples of differential weathering, like at Monument Valley, Arizona.



We also got a good view of what an oxbow lake looks like when viewed in cross-section. Note how this paleo-channel cuts into the layers beneath it, and is filled with a plug of dark shale, indicating low-energy, low-oxygen conditions.



2:00pm: After giving up on our chances to get out on the first berm of the outcrop, we depart the Sideling Hill Visitor Center, but pull over a short distance down the road to examine the diamictite on the western side of the roadcut. In drizzle, and shouting over the traffic, we discuss the multiple origins of diamictites:



2:10pm: On the road again, headed for our second destination, the Paw Paw Bends...

(More on that tomorrow)

All photos by Nicole LaDue, NSF. Thanks, Nicole!

Labels: field trips, maryland, stratigraphy, structure, valley and ridge

When she sees a geologic map of the eastern U.S., my cat Lola attempts to impress me by lining herself up with the trend of Appalachian structure. While noble in intent, she's not especially accurate. In the photo below, you can tell that she's off by about 20 degrees. Based on this, I conclude that cats have no natural instinct for structural geology. She can't use a Brunton compass, either.

Labels: geology, humor, lola, maryland