A bill working its way through the Senate right now, S-22, has some provisions you may be interested in. It's called the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act of 2009. Mainly, it sets aside a heckuva lot of wilderness areas. But the thing that brought it to my attention is that it sets aside some money to develop a "national geologic trail" focused on Glacial Lake Missoula, with an interpretive center to be located in Missoula, Montana. The Senate website describes it like this:

The Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail Designation Act (S. 268 and H.R.
450), would create a trail to document the catastrophic flooding that stretched
across parts of Montana, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington during the last Ice Age.
The designation of an Ice Age Floods Trail follows the recommendations of a 2001
study headed by the National Park Service which found the area suitable for
addition into the National Park System.

This part of the bill carries a possible pricetag of $12 million, with $2 specifically for the visitor center. Though there's no way the trail would be done by this summer, Glacial Lake Missoula's geologic signatures will be some of the highlights planned for this summer's Regional Field Geology of the Northern Rockies class.

Read more about it in this article in the Missoulian.

Hat tip to Babak R. for letting me know about this.

Labels: glacial landforms, glaciation, lakes, montana, national parks, politics

My friend Casey went to Michigan last weekend to hang out with her sisters, and one thing they did was go snowshoeing/sledding at the YMCA camp where they all grew up. When they walked out to the lake, an interesting sight awaited them: a scum of ice balls floating in the water, and (presumably pushed by the wind), collected up along the shore. She brought back some photos.


It's a neat phenomenon, and I'm not really too sure what to make of it. The question is: are these concentrically zoned features, like oolites, hailstones, or the hematite concretions seen in Friday's post? Or are they fragments of lake ice that got broken up and then rounded due to abrasion and jostling against one another in the waves? I'm guessing that the first hypothesis is correct, but unfortunately I don't have any way to test it from here in DC.


Some observations: the ice balls are pretty well sorted, pretty spherical, and well rounded. The ice balls are packed closer together closer to the shore. There also seems to be a size gradient from larger ice balls close to shore (right, in the image below) to smaller ice balls out into the open water of the lake (left, in the image below). If this isn't just a trick of the camera's perspective, could this correspond to increased growth due to closer packing (and thus more time lifted up out of the water into the cold Michigan air) close to the shore?

Finally, I note that in some areas, multiple ice balls have clumped together into a larger entity, as some oolites will do. This cohesion between ice balls is potentially the first step for making a solid layer of ice that will extend out from the shore over the whole lake.

Anyone else ever seen anything like this? What's going on?

Labels: ice, lakes, michigan