Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Accretion, anorthite, and aluminum

One of the interesting things I learned about when reading Marcia Bjornerud's Reading the Rocks was about the putting-together of our solar system. The scientific consensus is that our Sun is a second- or third-generation star, with previous iterations having been destroyed through supernovae. (The energy of the supernova is capable of fusing low-atomic-weight elements together into heavier elements.) Post-supernova, a big dispersed cloud of dust and gas existed: the pre-solar nebula. The next phase of history took the nebula and condensed it into a protoplanetary disc, and then that fried-egg-shaped accumulation self-organized (first via static charges attracting particles together -- the dust bunny effect -- and then via gravity). These simple forces brought many small particles of mass together into a smaller number of larger accumulations of mass. For a modern analogue to this process, consider the asteroid 25143 Itokawa, which looks like this:



It is, essentially, a big three-dimensional pile of space rock. I imagine that if you went and kicked it, some boulders would go flying off in all directions. It's a great example of the sorts of objects that we interpret occupying the early solar system. This process is self-amplifying (a positive feedback loop): the more mass you concentrate in a given area, the more gravity it exerts on surrounding masses, which pull towards one another, resulting in more mass, more gravity, more mass, and so on until you have planets. Eventually, if you get a big enough pile of space rock, gravity can condense it, and through warming (via radioactive decay, and potentially frictional heat from continuing impacts), the component elements could self-sort by density. Those with the highest specific gravity could sink down lower, whereas the scummier varieties would "float" up to a higher level.

Bjornerud astutely mentions that this early solar system would have lots of these little planetismals, kind of like those encountered in Antoine de Saint-Exupery's charming book The Little Prince:



Judging from the steam plume from that knee-high volcano, there's clearly some differentiation taking place down below. Now we get to the interesting part. Some asteroids fall to the planet Earth, whereupon we stop calling them asteroids, and start calling them meteorites. These meteorites are examined in great detail for information about our solar system's pre-pubescent years. One of them, the Allende meteorite, fell in the Chihuahua region of Mexico in early 1969:


image from Wikimedia commons

Geochemical analysis of the Allende meteorite by Lee, et al. (1976) showed something weird: the mineral anorthite, a feldspar, had mostly the same elements that anorthite has on Earth (or the moon): aluminum, calcium, silicon, and oxygen. But it also had a decent amount of magnesium. That's odd, because magnesium doesn't fit into anorthite's crystal structure very well at all. What's more, the magnesium in the Allende anorthite was all magnesium-26, not the "usual" magnesium-24. So... What's up with that?

It turns out that you can produce magnesium-26 as the stable daughter product when you break down radioactive aluminum-26. But aluminum-26 has a really short half-life (geologically speaking): only 730,000 years. As Bjornerud puts it, "The fact that a significant amount of aluminum-26 entered the meteorite's anorthite before decaying to magnesium-26 means that fewer than ten half-lives, and probably just a few million years, had passed between the supernova and the time that the anorthite crystals were being smelted out in the new solar refinery."

So that's stunning: the radioactive aluminum-26 was produced through a supernova explosion, and then, less than 5 million years later, a protoplanetary disc had formed and meteorites like Allende were being formed. Wow -- Until I read this passage, I had no idea that this phase of history went by so quickly! 5 million years is not a lot of time when you're talking about events of this magnitude. I was shocked, and I wanted to share this insight here. Are you shocked too?

______________________________________
References:
Lee, T., D. A. Papanastassiou, and G. J. Wasserburg (1976), Demonstration of 26 Mg excess in Allende and evidence for 26 Al, Geophysical Research Letters, 3(1), 41-44.

Zimmer, Ernst (2002), Using Aluminum-26 as a Clock for Early Solar System Events, Planetary Science Research Discoveries (website). Downloaded on December 16, 2009.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Hypocrisy and philosophy

So I'm in Patagonia right now, doing the thing I love to do most: travel across my home planet, checking out its less explored corners. Chile and Argentina are my 20th and 21st countries to visit. It is my second trip to South America. I've also travelled twice to Africa, four times to Asia (including my stint in Peace Corps Mongolia), and extensive travels in North America. I've only hit North Atlantic island nations as far as Europe is concerned. I've been to Australia once. I have not been to Antarctica.

So why am I listing all of this?

Because I'm a freaking hypocrite. I'm very concerned about how humanity is altering atmospheric chemistry, and what that's going to do to our (shared) planet's natural systems. Because I am convinced that we are releasing carbon into the atmosphere at a faster rate than natural systems can remove it, we are endangering ourselves (or at least some of ourselves) and also endangering the ecosystems that we depend on. I recognize the role the individual can/might/should play in reducing their personal carbon emissions through efficiency and lifestyle choices. I drive a Prius, use energy efficient light bulbs, recycle my cans and bottles and paper, serve on the College's "Green Committee," and teach (and blog) about the science underlying environmental issues, like climate change. I'm spreading the word, see?

But I really love to travel, and travel is a high-carbon endeavor. The best thing I could do for the world would probably be to stay home, but home gets stale. The world is big and diverse and full of landscapes and people and food and culture and birds and all kinds of interesting things. And there is nothing like getting out there and experiencing it firsthand. My time on this planet is finite, maybe close to half used up (assuming an average lifespan). What am I going to do during my time here? I figure I should live morally, attempt to improve things a bit, and enjoy myself. And I enjoy travelling more than anything else. I don't have kids (or an interest in having them), I'm not a religious person, I'm not tied down to a garden or a dog or a network of people that can't live without me. There's little to keep me in town when the opportunity for travel arises. And I have a career which gives me three and a half weeks off each winter and three months off each summer, plus a week of spring break. I have chosen my career in no small part because of the tremendous amount of free time it grants me each year. (Having a third of the year "off" makes up for the fifteen hour days I work during the fall and spring semesters, I reckon.)

My philosophy of life is essentially to facilitate and accrue a suite of fond memories and cool experiences. My goal is to enjoy my limited time here. Secondary goals: be a good person, help others out, learn as much as possible about the world I will spend my life in, share this perspective by spreading an understanding of the natural world, be creative, be responsible (but not so responsible, CO2-wise, that it cripples Goal #1). I am aware that this is a fundamentally self-centered approach, and I accept it.

So I know that there is a tangible global negative to my jetsetting habits, but the personal positive is what sways me. I'm going to keep travelling, because although environmental concerns mean a lot to me, experiencing the world means even more.

So that's my philosophical postcard from the austral hemisphere. ...Wish you were here!

--Mr. Hypocrite

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, December 25, 2009

Christmas decorations...

...from Google Maps:







The last one is where I am today, as this post automatically publishes. With any luck at all, I'll be over there by the glacier in the northwest. Merry Christmas from Patagonia, all!

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Geolutions 2010

Last new year's, I stated some of my goals for the year. Here they are again; I'll bold the ones I actually accomplished, and strike through the ones that I didn't.

1. visiting the Galapagos Islands
2. visiting the high Andes (Cotopaxi, Chimborazo), Ecuador
3. finding a cool outcrop of graded beds in the Martinsburg Formation (late Ordovician turbidites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia) that Rick Diecchio told me about last week
4. "walking on the Moho" in Gros Morne National Park, Newfoundland (late summer)
5. seeing Snowball rocks and Ediacarans on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland (late summer)
6. visiting Egg Mountain paleontological site, Montana
7. joining my colleague Ken Rasmussen's field trip to the Culpeper Basin, a Triassic rift valley in northern Virginia
8. some cool trip next winter break (2009-10): perhaps Patagonia? Or Antarctica?

I've also got some big teaching resolutions:

1. Running a successful and robust Structural Geology course for George Mason University (spring semester).
2. Running a successful and innovation Environmental Geology course for NOVA (spring semester).
3. Running a successful and safe Regional Field Geology of the Northern Rocky Mountains course for NOVA (summer semester).
4. Preparing and running a successful and groundbreaking Honors Historical Geology course linked with English Literature 242 at NOVA, where the English professor and I will bridge the two subjects with readings of Lyell, Darwin, "A Pair of Blue Eyes," and others (fall semester). (didn't get sufficient enrollment for this one; bummer!)

On other topics:

1. Finish my M.S.S.E. degree (July)
2. Buy a house
3. Put together a series of geology 'vodcasts' on local geology (though I've gathered a lot of footage that will eventually go into this series)
4. Write a few freelance articles [link]
5. Publish one cartoon per month in EARTH
6. Prepping (cutting and polishing) a backlog of rock samples from all over the place (I'll have to share the story soon of how our "Campus Safety Officer" emasculated my rock saw out of a fear of accidents and ensuing litigation: it's an absolute abomination...)
7. Successfully moving the geology department into our new building

So what's up for the coming year, 2010?
  1. More structure at GMU! Bigger, better, tweaked towards greater learning.
  2. Hire and train a new member of the NOVA geology team to take on some of the tasks that my colleagues and I can't currently keep up with.
  3. Actually get up to Newfoundland this year. I've got a family reunion up there in early August, so hopefully that will be the catalyst. (My mom's side of the family are Newfies.)
  4. Run my Rockies course (with co-instructor Pete Berquist) again.
  5. Update my website's numerous mentions of "greywacke" (English spelling) to "graywacke" (American spelling).
  6. Get my geoblogging under control. I'm clearly devoting too much time to this for too little recompense. Maybe an alternate would be: find a grant or some such to fund the time I spend writing this blog.
  7. Continue my cartooning for EARTH. Also occasional freelance writing pieces.
  8. Scan my Cartoon Guide to Geology and post it for download/printing on Lulu.
  9. Take meaningful action as a "citizen scientist" to combat climate change misinformation, creationism and Intelligent Design mumbo-jumbo, and other forms of pseudoscience pertinent to my expertise as a geologist.
  10. Get those geology vodcasts going.
  11. Go to Antarctica. (fingers crossed)
  12. Work less. Relax more. Be creative. Enjoy life.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Leech on the eyeball: ain't nothin' worse

My friend Noah's classic "leech on the eyeball" story is detailed in National Geographic:

Labels: , ,

Monday, December 21, 2009

Second blogiversary

Another year? Aye, indeed.

This blogiversary, I'd like to celebrate by dishing out some awards:

Most Geoblogosphere-Connected Individual

...goes to Michelle Arsenault, my pal who works at the National Science Foundation, and who:

  • worked with ReBecca at Glacier National Park,
  • mapped with Erik at field camp,
  • knows Anne from grad school at Oregon State University,
  • and knows me from the Geological Society of Washington.
  • Is there anyone else out there with strong personal connections to four different geobloggers? I'm doubting it. Michelle, I hereby confer the 2009 award to you.
Conscience of the Geoblogosphere

...goes to Kim Hannula, author of All My Faults Are Stress-Related, who:

  • voiced caution when GSA extended geobloggers an official invitation, asking for further clarification of details like responsibilities and expectations,
  • explored whether she was asked to review a paper because she blogged about a similar topic,
  • and sought to make sure the recent survey conducted of the geoblogosphere followed human research protocol.
  • Whereas I can get caught up in the ease of geoblogging, I like how Kim considers the details on a more professional, deliberative level. I'm glad she's there to ask the meta-questions!
Metropolis of the Geoblogosphere

...goes to Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana, home / temporary base / alma mater to a slew of geobloggers past and present:

Any other recognitions we should be awarding this year? Leave your suggestions in the comments section below.

Labels: ,

Sunday, December 20, 2009

"Faces of Earth"

A quick review: I just got done watching the 4-part series "Faces of Earth" (which was produced by the American Geological Institute, publishers of EARTH magazine).

I liked it. The main strength of the series is to use modern CGI techniques to depict long-term, large-scale geologic processes in a few seconds' time. I mentioned already that I was tickled by their depiction of Los Angeles sliding into position west of San Francisco as the Salinian Block moves northwestward along the San Andreas Fault.

The series is definitely for the beginner. As with many TV programs, the subtleties of the science get glossed over in favor of "cartoonishly" broad, sweeping statements. It's fun to watch though. The first episode seemed a little schizophrenic -- a sort of hodgepodge of all the cool stuff that geology research has revealed in recent decades. The third episode, themed as a west-to-east transect across America's most interesting geological locations was probably my favorite, though they really skimped on the Appalachian story. Oh well -- you can't have it all.

Check it out. If you're a NOVA person, we have it in the campus library. If you are a Netflix subscriber, you can put it in your queue. You could also ask Santa Amazon for it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Geologic resources inventories for national parks

A couple of months ago, I was asked for permission to include some of my photos in a new geologic resources inventory report for the George Washington Memorial Parkway and also for Rock Creek Park. I agreed, of course, and checking on the reports led me to a webpage that archives all the geologic reports the National Park Service has compiled for all the different parks. Though the GWMP and ROCR reports aren't there yet, there is a HUGE amount of useful information here for other parks. Bookmark it; use it.

Labels: , ,

Friday, December 18, 2009

Our route

Here's a Google Map I made up to show you where I'll be for the next few weeks. Hopefully, by the time you read this, we will be arriving in Puerto Montt, Chile. Tomorrow we get on a ferry and sail down the Chilean coast.

Zoom in on the southern area to see our hiking route (red) around Torres del Paine National Park. More details available by clicking on the different bits. I'm very excited.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Bummer

Map of remoteness

Holy cow... Have you seen this?

remote_map

I found a reproduction of this lovely map in the pages of this month's Discover magazine. It is a map of the most remote places on our planet, as defined by their distance from major cities (and also shipping channels). The scale at the bottom shows you how many hours (or days) it would take to get from pixel A to the nearest city. The darkest spots are the most remote ones.

The map was produced by Andrew Nelson of the Global Environmental Monitoring Unit of the European Commission. It is available here in a bigger form. They grant authorization to reproduce it, so long as you attribute them as the authors. Amazing work, Mr. Nelson; Gorgeous!
The Sahara, the Amazon Basin, the Australian Outback, New Guinea, boreal Canada, Greenland, the Rub' al Khali, northern Siberia, the interior of Borneo, and the Tibetan Plateau all jump out as remote locations. I post this map today because this evening I'm getting on a plane and heading for another remote location, the dark spot down at the southern tip of South America. Lily and I are spending the holidays in Patagonia. I'll be there for the next two and a half weeks, and I'll be back to DC and NOVA in the new year. To keep you amused in the meantime, I've scheduled posts to appear here on the blog while I am away. Enjoy your holidays!

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Geology Program Assistant job

Part-time geology program assistant: up to 20 hrs./week. Minimum: AA degree w/18 credits of geology; can start in January 2010. Contact Callan Bentley (cbentley@nvcc.edu) or Ken Rasmussen (krasmussen@nvcc.edu) for more details.

Labels: ,

9-year-old girl finds dino bone in Maryland

I missed this when it came out a couple of weeks ago... Oh well; better late than never.

Labels: , ,

Monday, December 14, 2009

David Byrne's stratified turkey


This food art by my main man David Byrne appears on daniellespencer.com along with many other similarly-shaped food sculptures. Here's what the judges said (emphasis mine):
Baby's First Turkey: Winner, "Most Wholesome". Byrne deftly addresses the
mortality of the turkey with its reconstitution in vegetable form. The layering
functions as a morphological evocation of sedimentary rock, thereby evoking the
passage of time
, while the vegetable puree evinces babyhood, enacting the cycle
of life. A bold and powerful statement.

Labels: , , , ,

A year of travels

After Magma Cum Laude, who did it after Woman Scientist...

January: Ecuador
iliniza_norte_07

February: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Massa_Syn_10

March: Washington, DC
heron_cherry

April: West Virginia


May: Petrology of Maryland
cockeysville04

June: Williamsburg, Virginia (toad in the College Woods:)
toad

July: Montana
CC_24

madison_river_lecture

August: Adirondacks and Oswego, New York
ads1

bluffs_08

September: Owens Valley, California
tafoni1

October: Yosemite, California and Portland, Oregon
yosemite_4

boring02

November: North Carolina Blue Ridge
chimney_rock18

December: Patagonia (Chile and Argentina) -- leaving in a mere 56 hours!
Image from Wikipedia; I'll supply a few of my own in the New Year!

Labels:

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Words' worth II

People. It's T. rex, not "T-Rex."

Also, silicon is an element (Si); silicone is a colloidal gel made with lots of water; silica is a compound (SiO2) which is the building block of many minerals.

Unique means "one of a kind." Therefore, applying modifiers to unique, like "very unique," or "most unique," add words without adding any additional meaning. If it's unique, it's unique. There's no such thing as "very one of a kind."

Thank you for your attention.

While I'm dispensing some advice, can someone give me some...? What's the difference in meaning between geologic and geological? And similarly, historic vs. historical?

What's the difference between silicic and siliceous?

Words' worth I

Labels: , ,

Friday, December 11, 2009

Float-by mooning

Gingkos in DC

gingko01

gingko02

gingko03

gingko04

The gingko is a tree with an ancient lineage as revealed by the Earth's fossil record. Their taxonomic division, the Gingkophyta, dates back to the Permian. Modern gingkos are all in one solitary (dare I say lonesome?) species with no other close living relatives.

They're also really popular in DC as a hardy ornamental tree used to soften up the urban landscape. Here's some photos along 13th Street NW (as I recall). You can see the bi-lobed shape of the leaves (Gingko biloba is the scientific name of the species), the primitive and (to my eye) inelegant way the branches jut out from the trunk, and the curious way that each tree seems to have its own sense of what season it is (third photo from the top): why are some still vibrant green while others yellowed and dropped their leaves weeks ago?

These photos were all taken about a month ago -- they're probably all bare by now.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Australians: "Iceberg Ahoy!"

Wow. Very cool. Literally.

Hat tip to Al Rasheed. Thanks Al!

Labels: , ,

"Those hacked e-mails": YouTube video

I thought this video does a nice job of investigating the hacked e-mails from CRU:

Rational, in context, and well-presented. I especially like the video author's advice at the end: if you don't believe his presentation, go check for yourself, with specific advice about what to check if you want to verify or refute his interpretation.

Labels: , , ,

The parking lot puddle revisited

Yesterday, I showed you these photos...
IMG_2260

IMG_2261
...and asked you to guess what they reminded me of.

Man, there were some great ideas people pitched forward! I was really impressed. One person even came up with the same idea that occurred to me!

Okay, so clearly what we've got here is a puddle that's drying up right? Some leaves and other botanical debris fell into the puddle and has thus become concentrated in this spot.

The pattern I noticed was a linear pile of debris [consisting mainly of the woody little "petals" of the tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) "flower"] as well as a dark color due to being damp. The edge of the damp patch parallels the edge of the linear tulip tree debris field. I think the way this formed was that in the puddle's earlier (larger) state, it was deep enough for the tulip tree "petals" to float, and wind pushed them all over to the same side of the puddle (the southern edge). As the puddle dried out, this stranded flotsam preserves either an earlier "shoreline" or an offshore parallel to the shoreline. (The second possibility would apply if the "petals" were too big to get pushed all the way to the actual shoreline: they may run aground some distance "offshore.")

This brought to mind the relationship between a continental ice sheet and the end moraine it leaves* behind. Glaciers expanded outward, reach their maximum size, stay there for some amount of time, flowing along and depositing a scum of debris all along their edges. Later, they melt back, or possibly melt away entirely. However, the debris belt marks how far out they once reached. Here's a geological equivalent, in a map** showing end moraines (green) in Minnesota, Iowa, and South Dakota:


As the moraine marks the former extent of the glacier, so too does the stranded line of tulip tree flotsam mark the former extent of the puddle. Fresh from my lectures on glaciation and the Ice Ages, I got the sense I was looking from west to east across North America, seeing Canada recently scraped clean (wet areas) and the far-right ("south") accumulation of tulip tree petals morphed in my mind into a terminal moraine complex.

The main problem with this analogy: puddles are standing water, not flowing ice. Still, I can't help but see a similarity in process, regardless of the huge differences in scale and materials. I see the world through geology-colored glasses.
_______________________________________
* no pun intended
** From the U.S.G.S.'s "Glacial map of the U.S. east of the Rockies, west half" (1959)," via here

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

What do you see here?

Walking to my car in the lower NOVA parking lot last week, I saw this:
IMG_2260

A closer view:
IMG_2261

I was immediately struck that the patterns observed here could be an analogy for another geologic process. Any ideas what occurred to me?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Shooting Incident at Woodbridge Campus

Woodbridge Campus Closed for Evening
December 8, 2009
Woodbridge, VA (December 8, 2009) – There was a shooting incident at the Woodbridge Campus of Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) that occurred today at approximately 2:13 p.m. At this time, there are no injuries reported from the incident. The incident is under investigation and more information is forthcoming.All Woodbridge classes will be cancelled, including NOVA classes being held at Freedom High School for the remainder of the evening.For more information about students, faculty and staff, families should meet at Freedom High School.Our goal is to ensure every possible measure is taken to guarantee the safety of our faculty, staff and students. We will keep the public informed regarding any new developments as soon as they occur.

Labels: ,

Hacked e-mail resources

The Way Things Break has a nice "review" post up pointing to the "emerging scientific consensus on the SwiftHack e-mails."

I hope my e-mails never get published online because I can sometimes be brusque or snarky or dimwitted and ignorant, and this incident has reminded me never to type something online that I don't mind the whole world seeing. A good thing to be reminded of, particularly (listen up, young people) in terms of the sorts of stuff that gets press time on Facebook.

That being said, I think it was wise of (CRU head) Phil Jones to step aside for an inquiry. My sense of things so far is that there isn't anything wrong, but I'm willing to be convinced otherwise if the inquiry suggests there was any kind of fraud. The e-mails I've seen are not particularly damning scientifically, given that they are taken out of context. All data gets processed, and I suspect that's all that was going on at CRU, though the words used to describe it are unfortunate. A lot of scientists I know write e-mails the way I do, and I'm sure it would be easy to take any particular e-mail completely out of context and interpret it incorrectly and embarrassingly.

I wonder what life would be like for other scientists if they were working on politically-charged topics like climate change. What would the structural geologists say if a tectonics working group got hacked and a media firestorm erupted with individuals quoting a line or two of an e-mail out of context to suggest that plate tectonics was a vast conspiracy of left-winger outdoorsy types just looking for research dollars so they could go hang out in the mountains? Or a group of sedimentologists get hacked, and the hackers scream that their e-mails show geologic time is a fraud? Maybe some physicists could get hacked, and the resulting headlines on Fox News would be that "Theory of Gravity called Into Question. Inquiry Launched." Chemists: it could happen to you too. You won't be able to keep your "everything is made out of atoms" charade up much longer...

One more, for reals: I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if there were some creationists out there looking at this chaos and thinking, "We should hack some biologists' e-mails, and then publish the lines that would call evolution into question." Stay tuned for that. You heard it here first.

I want to be excited for Copenhagen, but this CRU "Climategate" business definitely casts a shadow over things. Unfortunate timing...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, December 7, 2009

December paleo. meeting

PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON
presents

Planktonic foraminiferal species turnover and paleoceanographic change across the Aptian/Albian boundary

Brian Huber
Curator of Planktonic Foraminifera at the National Museum of Natural History

Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009
7:00 p.m., in the Cooper Room, National Museum of Natural History
10th St. & Constitution Ave.
Non-Smithsonian visitors will be escorted
to the Cooper Room at 6:30 and 6:55 p.m.
Meet in the Constitution Avenue lobby at 5:00 p.m. to join us for dinner at 'Elephant and Castle.' Latecomers can meet directly at the restaurant at the NW corner of 12th & Penn. Ave., NW

About the speaker and the talk: Brian Huber has been on several ODP cruises, has served as a member of several international groups involved with foraminifera and with Cretaceous stratigraphy, and has served a term as President of the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research. Huber's work is a mix of micropaleontology and geochemistry. The Aptian/Albian boundary is a stage boundary about 112 million years ago in the later part of the Early Cretaceous. Several unusual geochemical changes occurred at this boundary and oceanographic and climate conditions were very different than in the modern world, making understanding events at this time one of the great puzzles of paleontology. Huber's work includes data from Ocean Drilling Program cores that provide exceptionally detailed data.

Labels: , , , ,

Fade to black

...more fun with Google Maps! Zoom out from each map to see what black part of the globe they depict.











Labels: , ,

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Opferkessels

...That's what those depressions were at the top of Chimney Rock!

Philip was asking if I knew what I was talking about. It appears that I might. Here are some website links to learn more about them.

Shenandoah National Park's NPS website has a "Did You Know?" feature at the bottom of each page which says this about opferkessels: "Did You Know? The small circular pits (Opferkessels) often found in the rocks of Shenandoah National Park's cliffs and summits are formed by standing water."

Hat tip to James Holland for suggesting that this was the term I was searching for... Thanks James!

Labels:

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Variation in calcification among species under ocean acidification

There's a new paper out in this month's Geology that's worth a mention.

It's a study looking at the biological effects of ocean acidification on a suite of organisms which secrete skeletons of calcite or aragonite.

The scientists grew 18 different species of calcifying organisms (across a broad taxonomic swath representative of both oceanic diversity and styles of calcification). Over a 90 day period, they jacked up the level of CO2 in the growing chamber, which the water absorbed and thus converted to carbonic acid. The levels tested ranged from ~400 ppm CO2 to 2850 ppm. This lowered the pH of the water through the same mechanism as is occuring in the world ocean due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The lower pH resulted in changes in the saturation state of calcite and aragonite (calcite being slightly tougher than aragonite: it stands up to dissolution by lower pH better). One of the organisms tested is the sea urchin Eucidaris tribuloides, shown in the image above. This image was the one chosen to grace the cover of this issue of Geology. The scale bar is 1 cm.

My hypothesis going into such an experiment would be that all the organisms would experience lower rates of calcification, or even dissolution, under the more acidic regime. However, that is not what the researchers found. While most of the organisms did follow that expectation, there were a significant minority that did not. Here's the only figure in the paper, a graph showing the results for each species, comparing calcification rate to the saturation state of aragonite (lower omega values = more acidic). So each graph should be read as "more acid to the left, more neutral to the right"):

urchin
Ten of the 18 species (temperate corals, pencil urchins, hard clams, conchs, serpulid worms, periwinkles, bay scallops, oysters, whelks, soft clams) had their net calcification rate decrease. Of those, six of the ten negatively impacted species (pencil urchins, hard clams, conchs, periwinkles, whelks, soft clam) actually lost shell material through dissolution. Four of the 18 species (limpets, purple urchins, coralline red algae, calcareous green algae) net calcification increased under intermediate conditions of acidification, and then declined at the highest levels. In three species (crabs, lobsters, and shrimp), net calcification was greatest under the highest level of acidification. One species, the blue mussel, exhibited no response to elevated CO2 levels.

What this means is that there's NOT just one simple rule for how calcifying organisms respond to increases in CO2-induced ocean acidification. Some organisms predictably do worse at building calcitic skeletons, while others seem to do a better job than ever. The authors offer some possible explanations for why this might be the case: "These varied responses may reflect differences amongst organisms in their ability to regulate pH at the site of calcification, in the extent to which their outer shell layer is protected by an organic covering, in the solubility of their shell or skeletal mineral [i.e. aragonite and high-Mg calcite are more soluble], and in the extent to which they utilize photosynthesis [because the CO2 is actively absorbed by the organism to do photosynthesis]."

This information will be useful not only in terms of better predicting the effects of anthropogenic CO2 on marine biota and ecosystems, but also in terms of sorting out ancient mass extinctions. Because the study identifies both positive and negative responses to elevated CO2-induced acidification for a wide range of organisms, the results offer "a unique, polyphyletic fingerprint for identifying such CO2-induced extinction events in the fossil record." In other words, we could go and look for winners and losers in various past mass extinctions and see if they match this "CO2-induced acidification" pattern. If so, then that would give us higher confidence in attriuting a particular mass extinction to elevated CO2 levels.

Reference:
Ries, J., Cohen, A., & McCorkle, D. (2009). Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification Geology, 37 (12), 1131-1134 DOI: 10.1130/G30210A.1

Labels: , ,

Friday, December 4, 2009

Pompei in Google Street-View

You can now tour the ruins of Pompei (buried in AD 79 in ash from Mt. Vesuvius) in Google Street-View. Pretty cool.

Hat tip to Morning Edition.

Labels: , , ,

What happened to Bpr3?

Back when I started writing this blog, there was a little "research blogging" icon we were all using to signify when we were blogging about peer-reviewed research. What happened to that? I go to Bpr3.org now, and it's kind of weird.

The headline tabs include such redundancies as "Science News," "Scientific," and "Science." What the heck? And they all lead to "404" errors -- pages not found.

Worse, the cool little "research blogging" icon has disappeared. Bummer. Can some science blogger out there bring me up to date on the new zeitgeist for peer-reviewed research blogging?

Labels:

"Mass Graves of the South Dakota Inner Sea"

Mass Graves of the South Dakota Inner Sea

Location: Calvert Marine Museum Indoor Auditorium, Solomons, MD
December 5, 2009 2:30 PM

FREE Public Lecture in the museum auditorium

Join Bill Palmer presenting "Mass Graves of the South Dakota Inner Sea."

Approximately eighty million years ago, periodic volcanic eruptions to the west of the South Dakota Inner Sea carpeted hundreds of square miles with ash. Some of this area was purchased by the U.S. government in the 1960s because a vast number of fossils are found there in rock layers known as the Pierre Shale. Some of the fossiliferous layers are over 30 feet thick. These layers now preserve the skeletons of thousand of marine reptiles, pterosaurs (i.e., the extinct flying reptiles), sharks, and fishes.

Hosted by the Calvert Marine Museum Fossil Club and sponsored by the Clarissa and Lincoln Dryden Endowment for Paleontology. For additional information, please contact Stephen Godfrey, CMM's Curator of Paleontology, at 410-326-2042, ext. 28.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Chimney Rock, North Carolina

The other day, I mentioned the lineated granite gneiss we saw when hiking in Hickory Nut Gorge State Park on Thanksgiving Day (hey, maybe it's not quite up to the standards of last Thanksgiving's hike, but I'm cool with that). The next day, we headed to Chimney Rock to check out the scene there.

Here's a Google Map of the site (satellite view):


...and a zoomed-in view where you can see the tan ellipse of Chimney Rock itself:


Chimney Rock is located right at the Blue Ridge mountain front, where the mountainous terrain underlain by Grenvillian basement complex (Mesoproterozoic) gives way to the multiple metamorphosed oceanic terranes of the Piedmont province (like the metavolcanics mentioned earlier this week). Here's a view east across this physiographic (and geologic) boundary:
chimney_rock17
This boundary is called the Brevard Zone, a fault/mylonite zone of complicated structure. I don't know much about the Brevard Zone, but those Carolinian geologists are all over it. It's something I'd like to learn more about. If you have any particular expertise to contribute, please leave a comment telling us more (and giving us outcrop recommendations!).

Here's the star attraction of Chimney Rock Park:
chimney_rock20
You can see from the bridge and the flag that it has been developed, and much of the park exhibits "improvements" from the natural state.

Before climbing up to the Rock, we decided to hike out to the waterfall upstream. Chimney Rock projects from the wall of a deeply incised canyon carved by the Broad River. A tributary of the Broad flows over the lip of the canyon, providing a lovely waterfall. This scenic location was the spot where they filmed the final scene in the movie version of Last of the Mohicans:
chimney_rock04

Here's a view across the gorge (from underneath an overhang), looking towards the north:
chimney_rock11

At the site of the waterfall, I was intrigued to note that the rocky walls were exhibiting "onion skin" weathering (exfoliation jointing) that in my experience is more typical of granites (say, like those in the Sierra Nevada):
chimney_rock05

Here's a smaller version of the same phenomenon: a flake parts with its source rock, leaving the source rock more spheroidal than it was before. Oak leaves provide a sense of scale:
chimney_rock07

The rock exposed in Chimney Rock Park is a gneiss. I didn't see any here that was noticably lineated, but it had a pronounced horizontal foliation. The rock varies quite a lot in its texture and degree of deformation. Here's some photos:
chimney_rock09

Penny for scale:
chimney_rock19

Penny for scale:
chimney_rock01

In places, the metamorphic foliation has been deformed. Mainly this is evidenced in charismatic, high-contrast folds, but there is also some small-scale faulting visible, and some boudinage. Here are some images of the folds:
chimney_rock02

Isoclinal fold. Penny for scale:
chimney_rock06

Penny for scale (bottom):
chimney_rock03

chimney_rock08

chimney_rock10

chimney_rock16

Lily points above her head at some parasitic folding:
chimney_rock13

Here, Lily appears to hold up a big ellipse with an axial ratio of 6 or 7:
chimney_rock14
This is a section through an isoclinal fold, so that the fold axis is transected once on the left and once (on a differently oriented surface) on the right.

Finally we approached Chimney Rock itself, a looming monolith whose presence was indicating by a loudly flapping flagpole. When a gust of wind came along, the sudden clatter of the flag whipping in the wind was quite disconcerting. From below, it sounded a lot like a rockfall had initiated somewhere up above us. Note how the shape of Chimney Rock appears to be a compromise between the ~horizontal fissility of the gneiss and the spheroidal weathering associated with exfoliation:
chimney_rock12

Little wooden walkways and staircases are draped all over the face of the mountain, including a catwalk out to Chimney Rock itself:
chimney_rock18

Atop Chimney Rock, we found these little holes which were filled with water. I forget the name of these things - can someone remind me in the comments section below?
chimney_rock15
Essentially what's going on here is a self-perpetuating focusing of weathering. A small initial divot in the rock face allows water to accumulate. That water facilitates additional weathering through freeze-thaw action and chemical breakdown of the minerals in the gneiss. This weathering enlarges the size of the depression, which allows more water to accumulate, which triggers more weathering. It's a nice example of a positive feedback loop: a small initial perturbation auto-catalyzes itself into a much larger final effect. I've seen similar structures atop many mountaintops.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Rip van Winkle

Suppe seminar at UMD next Wednesday

A special seminar coming up at the University of Maryland, College Park:

Wednesday December 9, 11:00am-12noon
CHEM 0115 (next to the Chemistry office)

John Suppe, Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University
"Deep and shallow structure of the Taiwan arc-continent collision"

Abstract: The on-going oblique arc-continent collision in Taiwan between the Luzon arc and the Eurasian continental margin provides a classic spatial view of the temporal evolution of the collision. In addition Taiwan is a well-known site of critical-taper wedge mechanics and erosional forcing of deformation, leading to a mountain belt that is approximately in topographic steady state, with erosion balancing the compressive flux. This classic picture, based largely on surface and upper-crustal data, is now being illuminated at lower crustal and upper mantle levels with highresolution local seismic tomography and earthquake locations. These new data document in 3D that the deep structure is remarkably independent of the shallow thinned-skinned mountain belt. Here we show that the lower crust and upper mantle of the Eurasian plate undergoes a transition from normal subduction and accretionarywedge tectonics south of Taiwan to a strongly localized progressively bent geometry with a vertical to overturned plate interface. The lower crust and Moho of the Eurasian plate is vertical to overturned to depths of 70-80 km under central and northern Taiwan. In this region the deep plate shortening is accomplished by folding of both the Eurasian and Philippine-Sea lower lithospheres without an active subduction zone, whereas the crust of both plates above the main detachment is mechanically and kinematically separated from this deep shortening.

I'll be there, for sure!

Labels: , , , ,

Fade to white

Can you guess which of these Google Maps is (a) Greenland, (b) Australia, (c) Antarctica, and (d) Utah?







Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Tom Simkin memorial at AGU

Tom Simkin Memorial

18:00-20:00, Thursday 17 December at Moscone Center South, Room Esplanade 302
(Not at the Marriott Marquis as listed in the AGU program)

A reception held for friends and colleagues to celebrate the life and contributions of Tom Simkin (1933-2009). Tom Simkin's distinguished career in volcanology at the Smithsonian spanned more than four decades. He was a pioneer in the investigation of volcanism on a global scale, and was the founder and director of the Smithsonian's Global Volcanism Program (GVP) until 1995. The twin pillars of the GVP lay in both documenting current volcanic activity and unrest and in developing a database of volcanoes and their eruptions during the past 10,000 years. He also led efforts resulting in three editions of the popular map of the Earth, This Dynamic Planet, in collaboration with colleagues from the USGS and the Naval Research Lab. The latest edition(2006) can also be found online.

Contact Paul Kimberly for questions regarding the reception (kimberlyp@si.edu). Tom's wife, Sharon, will attend the reception and be in San Francisco the week of AGU.

Labels: , , , , ,

Lineated granite gneiss from NC Blue Ridge

Thanksgiving Day, Lily and I took a hike in Hickory Nut Gorge State Park, North Carolina, just south of the much-better-known Chimney Rock, which was closed for the holiday.



Just outside the park, on the public right-of-way, I collected this lovely chunk of granite gneiss which shows both foliation and lineation:
lineated_gneiss_NC

This is classic Blue Ridge province basement rock; it formed ~1.1 or 1.2 billion years ago during the episode of mountain building known as the Grenvillian Orogeny. We've got many of the same sorts of rocks (though slightly younger) up in Shenandoah National Park in Virginia. However, the thing that caught my eye about this one is the fact that it has such well-developed lineation. You're probably already familiar with foliation, the planar alignment of mineral grains in many metamorphic rocks. Lineation, a linear alignment of mineral grains, is somewhat less common, as it requires a different sort of stress field to form. In the scanned image above, you're looking straight at the plane of foliation. Within that plane of foliation is the pronounced lineation, which indicates that the maximum principle stress was directed perpendicular to foliation (plane of the screen), an intermediate principle stress was directed left to right, and the minimum principle stress was directed top to bottom, which is why the gneiss squootched out in that direction*. Hemmed in from the sides, smushed from the front and back, it had nowhere to go but "up." The strain ellipsoid here would be shaped something like a flatworm, or a baguette that had been run over by a steamroller.

* I'm assuming a monoclinic stress field.

Labels: , , , , ,