One of the highlights of this past summer's Northern Rockies field course was an afternoon set aside as a "choose your own adventure" hike in Teton National Park. Some students opted for Cascade Canyon; others climbed Blacktail Butte. Four of us wanted something really challenging, so we chose Hanging Canyon at the recommendation of my friend Amy Manhart, who lives in Jackson and knows the Tetons like the back of her hand.

We took a ferry across Jenny Lake along with the Cascade Canyon Crew, and then started climbing up. A thunderstorm rolled up Jackson Hole, with much ominous booming and lightning, but we didn't get hit with the storm directly. The climb was very steep, but we entertained ourselves along the way with a geological conundrum: We discussed how best to interpret a hypothetical piece of float that is half granite and half diorite: Is it more parsimonious to guess that the granite represents an intrusion or an inclusion? The implications for the relative dates of the two units are huge: if the diorite is an intrusion, it's younger than the granite. If the diorite is a xenolith (an inclusion) within the granite, then it's older than the granite. Consider the possibilities:



Ultimately, there's no answer to this question without finding an outcrop of the rock in situ, which is why it's entertaining to consider when you're slogging up a 2000 foot hillside. My co-instructor Pete Berquist and I upped the ante by each doggedly defending one of the two indefensible interpretations and sticking to it for the sake of argument. Pete was the xenolith man, whereas I came down fully on the side of the dikes. Our students Joel and Ken were "fortunate" enough to listen to Pete and I bicker about the relative merits of our favored interpretations. Rest breaks came whenever either Pete or I found a boulder along the hillside that showed evidence to support our position. We would stop to consider it, catch our breath, and the resume the uphill climb and the argument. The bad weather passed and the day was beautiful. We were unencumbered by the need to reach a conclusion or acknowledge the obvious: the best interpretation is that such half-&-half clasts "cannot be interpreted."

Here's Pete posing with an obvious dike (I forced him! Ha!):


Here's me posing with an obvious xenolith (Oh well, fair's fair...):


We had a similar ongoing "argument" on the trip about the merits of "Tertiary" versus "Paleogene." I think it keeps students amused to see their professors going back and forth over geologic ideas -- surely if these fellows spend this much energy and thought discussing some geologic question, it must be valid and important... ...right?

More on the Hanging Canyon hike tomorrow...

Labels: archean, geologic time, igneous, national parks, nova, structure, travel, wyoming, xenoliths