Morning, folks. I awake to a challenge from Chris at GoodSchist, to show where my local bedrock was at the time of Pangea's incipient breakup. (I think Chris chose the late Triassic, 220 Ma, since Ron Blakely's map of that time shows New Zealand clearly in the south.) It's an interesting time for the rock beneath Washington, DC. After have just experienced ~50 million years of crunching between North America and Africa, DC's tortured bedrock is now being stretched as Africa begins to pull away again. A series of rift valleys mark the stretching of the crust, shown clearly in the map as a series of NE-SW oriented lakes along the axis of the Appalachian orogen.

DC's future location is between two of those rift valley lakes: one to the east, one to the west. If I owned DC real estate during the Triassic, I'd be very interested in this process, because one of those rift valleys is going to become a new ocean basin, and one isn't. The one that isn't is destined to stop opening and fill in with dirt. It will be a failed rift valley, an aulacogen of sorts.

The question is: which one is the weakest link? If the one to the west breaks open, that will be the new Atlantic Ocean basin, and DC will stay hitched to Africa. If the one to the east breaks open, that will be the site of the Atlantic, and DC will stay hitched to North America.

As it turned out, the eastern rift was the one that connected up with other rifts to the northeast and southwest, and became the young Atlantic. The western rift, known as the Culpeper Basin, stopped stretching open, and got filled in with sediment. DC stayed attached to North America, and that's the way it is.

Labels: culpeper basin, dc, geology, mesozoic, piedmont, plate tectonics