Monday, February 8, 2010
Just got a note about a two-year-old blog about geology that has so far escaped my attention (and possibly also the attention of the curator of the geoblogosphere, Robert Huber?) Bloc de camp (Catalan for "Field Notebook") is a blog dedicated to the geological heritage of Catalonia (country around Barcelona, northeastern Iberian Peninsula). It can be read in Catalan, Spanish and English. They are also on Facebook.
Upcoming changes
Thanks to the 64 of you who have already completed the survey which accompanied the thousandth post here. The survey is intended for ALL readers of this blog, no matter who you are. So if you haven't yet shared your feedback, please do so now. I'll close the survey on Friday morning. I really am interested in your perspective. There are some major changes in the works for this blog, and I've already gotten some terrific ideas from the survey responses.
I'll announce the changes sometime next week... after I've heard from everyone who has something to say.
I'll announce the changes sometime next week... after I've heard from everyone who has something to say.
Labels: blogs
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Snowtographs
You may have heard that D.C. got some snow this weekend. (It's true.) We went for a walk this morning to check out what the snowed-in city looked like. Here are a few photos...


This is fun:

K Street, home of the lobbyists:

Group of robins hanging out at National Geographic HQ:

The White House gets whiter:

A magnolia tree in Jackson Square, not doing so well:

(Magnolias seem particularly susceptible to losing limbs via heavy snow...)
Photogenic trees:


Washington Monument:

Up-side-down Diplocraterion? Or just where someone sat in the snow?

This trace fossil is more obvious; Bicyclus, clearly:

The National Mall (Smithsonian's Natural History Museum at left, Capitol Building at right):

Doppelganger week for the Capitol:

Cold Triceratops:

Snow decorates the trees in front of the FBI building:

Pennsylvania Avenue:

Callan checks on the snow depth:

Guess this roof isn't very well insulated...

Some structures... Here's a set of two normal faults in a snow stratum atop a hedge:

(Glove for scale, of course.) Here's a different angle on these extensional structures:

(Because GMU classes were canceled on Friday, I assigned my structural geology students to make some structures in the snow -- like Kim's example, perhaps, or perhaps like this hedge, but really limited only by their own imaginations...)
Here's a different one:

That's a sheet of snow being driven downward by gravity, sliding over a roof (fault-like) but then arching up at the tip (this would look 'antiform' if it were rotated 90 degrees...). Kind of like a compressional antiform transitioning into a thrust fault, a common 'structural ingredient' in fold and thrust belts the world over.
Some more normal faults, including en echelon arrays like we saw last September in the volcanic tableland north of Bishop, California... These are viewed from the bottom -- they are forming in snow atop the glass roof of the pagoda-thingy that covers the Columbia Heights metro escalators. Notice too the color difference (due to more or less snow) from the peak of the pagoda (where the faults are -- an area of "crustal" thinning) to the bottom (where the snow is thickest).

Finally, if you haven't already seen it, check out this time-lapse image of the snow accumulating! And here's one from Greg Willis, who has shared videos on this blog before... Enjoy!
Stay warm out there, everyone...


This is fun:

K Street, home of the lobbyists:

Group of robins hanging out at National Geographic HQ:

The White House gets whiter:

A magnolia tree in Jackson Square, not doing so well:

(Magnolias seem particularly susceptible to losing limbs via heavy snow...)
Photogenic trees:


Washington Monument:

Up-side-down Diplocraterion? Or just where someone sat in the snow?

This trace fossil is more obvious; Bicyclus, clearly:

The National Mall (Smithsonian's Natural History Museum at left, Capitol Building at right):

Doppelganger week for the Capitol:

Cold Triceratops:

Snow decorates the trees in front of the FBI building:

Pennsylvania Avenue:

Callan checks on the snow depth:

Guess this roof isn't very well insulated...

Some structures... Here's a set of two normal faults in a snow stratum atop a hedge:

(Glove for scale, of course.) Here's a different angle on these extensional structures:

(Because GMU classes were canceled on Friday, I assigned my structural geology students to make some structures in the snow -- like Kim's example, perhaps, or perhaps like this hedge, but really limited only by their own imaginations...)
Here's a different one:

That's a sheet of snow being driven downward by gravity, sliding over a roof (fault-like) but then arching up at the tip (this would look 'antiform' if it were rotated 90 degrees...). Kind of like a compressional antiform transitioning into a thrust fault, a common 'structural ingredient' in fold and thrust belts the world over.
Some more normal faults, including en echelon arrays like we saw last September in the volcanic tableland north of Bishop, California... These are viewed from the bottom -- they are forming in snow atop the glass roof of the pagoda-thingy that covers the Columbia Heights metro escalators. Notice too the color difference (due to more or less snow) from the peak of the pagoda (where the faults are -- an area of "crustal" thinning) to the bottom (where the snow is thickest).

Finally, if you haven't already seen it, check out this time-lapse image of the snow accumulating! And here's one from Greg Willis, who has shared videos on this blog before... Enjoy!
Stay warm out there, everyone...
Labels: dc, dinosaurs, fossils, humor, smithsonian, snow, structure
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Two books about evolution
Book Month continues...Why Evolution Is True - Jerry Coyne
I already mentioned one of the three great books about evolution that came out recently: Your Inner Fish, by Neil Shubin*. I heartily recommend pairing Fish with WEIT, as they have some overlap in content and style. This is an easily-accessible review of the most important (and compelling) bits that pile up in support of the idea that evolution has occurred over time, and that natural selection is its principle driver. It's full of interesting facts that are clear refutations of the idea of divine creation of all species from separate starting points in the recent geological past. FYI, Coyne is also a blogger: he writes semi-daily at the blog Why Evolution Is True (shocking title, eh?).
The Greatest Show on Earth - Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins gets plenty of press time for his athiest viewpoint, and he's written a book about that, too (which I haven't read). As a result, many theists probably won't want to touch any of his other tomes with a ten-foot pole. But I assure you, that would be a huge mistake when it comes to The Greatest Show on Earth: this is an amazing, rich, awesome book. It demolishes the notion of a young Earth and special creation with a treasure trove of information about biological systems. More importantly, it celebrates the beauty of evolution: Dawkin's delight in the various evolved solutions to the problems of living is evident. Like luciferin, it shines from the page. The way I see it, Why Evolution Is True and Your Inner Fish play the part of "executive summaries," while The Greatest Show on Earth is the juicy, complicated, tangled jungle of evolutionary explanation. It's great. While it lacks the quality of being concise, Dawkins' erudition and clear-mindedness more than make up for it. Consider Coyne's WEIT as your appetizer, but save Dawkins for the main course.
____________________________________________
* By the way, Neil Shubin has posted PowerPoint slideshows of the images in each chapter of Your Inner Fish for use by educators teaching about evolution. Check them out. Unfortunately, there are a substantial number of spelling errors in the captions to these images, but the images themselves could be quite useful to anyone wanting to incorporate an 'evo-devo' element into Historical Geology or Paleontology.
Friday, February 5, 2010
"Reading the Rocks" by Marcia Bjornerud
Book Month continues...
I recently read the excellent book Reading the Rocks, by Marcia Bjornerud. I would recommend this book to anyone interested in their planet. I think it's an equally good choice for professionals and interested amateurs. The book works on several levels. It's lyrically written, with an economy of flourishes, but an ear for a good turn of phrase. She's also really keen on analogies, and that makes me like her a lot. Finally, she seems to be a kindred spirit, using geological insight as a gateway to philosophical perspective. The book is rich in detail, though broad enough in scope that it will satisfy a structural geologist, an astronomer, or your average run-of-the-mill nature lover.
A taste of her style:
"Human consciousness is arguably the first truly novel innovation to arise since Cambrian time, in the sense that the technologies our consciousness has spawned have freed us from the limits of our own body architecture." (p. 172)
"Over more than 4 billion years, in beach sand, volcanic glass, granites, and garnet schists, the planet has unintentionally kept a rich and idiosyncratic journal of its past.... The genre varies from breathless thriller to quotidian diary; the action ranges from microbial metabolisms to mountain building." (p. 5)
Under a section subtitled "Grammar and Syntax of the Three Rock Languages," Bjornerud says, "Just as you wouldn't look to a cookbook for information on military history, you wouldn't expect a sandstone to tell you much about the Earth's interior. Sedimentary rocks are the best reference works to consult if you are interested in past conditions at the surface of the Earth - for example, ancient climates, biological activity, or the distribution of water bodies. Igneous rocks chronicle the long-term chemical evolution of the Earth and provide glimpses into processes that occur at inaccessible depths. Metamorphic rocks, born in one setting (sedimentary or igneous) and transformed as they encounter new environments, are the travel writers of the rock world, chronicling their astounding journeys through the crust." (p. 33)
I love how she gives anthropomorphic personalities to rocks. This is her great talent as a writer. Along similar lines as the quote above, she later compares mafic to felsic igneous rocks: "A mafic rock like basalt generally has tales to tell of life in the mantle, while for a felsic rock like granite, whose progenitors were themselves crustal, the mantle is a nearly forgotten ancestral homeland." (p. 43)
She has a great analogy for radioactive decay, using "parent" and "daughter" as part of the analogy itself: A "magnanimous parent who transfers half of his savings to his daughter each year on her birthday." Each year, the parent has less money, but the daughter's wealth has grown by exactly that same amount. "At any time, an external auditor could determine the age of the girl - the number of years the parent had been giving money to her - by finding the ratio of the amount in the daughter's account to the amount in the father's account." (p. 58) Clever!
She gives some great comparisons for viscosity, including glacial ice, basaltic lava, rhyolitic lava, motor oil, water at room temperature, and blood (which she helpfully reminds us is thicker than water).
Chapter 3 concludes with a great comparison between the small and the large: "...Small phenomena can wield surprising power: A trivial deviation from sphericity causes the entire planet to wobble, raindrops and tiny flaws in minerals bring down mountains, trace gases in the air govern climate, and microbes modulate the atmosphere. Perhaps the greatest challenge we face in attempting to fathom the Earth is to gain a proper sense of our own size as a human species; like spoiled children, we routinely overstimate our importance on the planet but underestimate the destructiveness of our self-absorption." (p.98)
Criticism:
I recently read the excellent book Reading the Rocks, by Marcia Bjornerud. I would recommend this book to anyone interested in their planet. I think it's an equally good choice for professionals and interested amateurs. The book works on several levels. It's lyrically written, with an economy of flourishes, but an ear for a good turn of phrase. She's also really keen on analogies, and that makes me like her a lot. Finally, she seems to be a kindred spirit, using geological insight as a gateway to philosophical perspective. The book is rich in detail, though broad enough in scope that it will satisfy a structural geologist, an astronomer, or your average run-of-the-mill nature lover.
A taste of her style:
"Human consciousness is arguably the first truly novel innovation to arise since Cambrian time, in the sense that the technologies our consciousness has spawned have freed us from the limits of our own body architecture." (p. 172)
"Over more than 4 billion years, in beach sand, volcanic glass, granites, and garnet schists, the planet has unintentionally kept a rich and idiosyncratic journal of its past.... The genre varies from breathless thriller to quotidian diary; the action ranges from microbial metabolisms to mountain building." (p. 5)
Under a section subtitled "Grammar and Syntax of the Three Rock Languages," Bjornerud says, "Just as you wouldn't look to a cookbook for information on military history, you wouldn't expect a sandstone to tell you much about the Earth's interior. Sedimentary rocks are the best reference works to consult if you are interested in past conditions at the surface of the Earth - for example, ancient climates, biological activity, or the distribution of water bodies. Igneous rocks chronicle the long-term chemical evolution of the Earth and provide glimpses into processes that occur at inaccessible depths. Metamorphic rocks, born in one setting (sedimentary or igneous) and transformed as they encounter new environments, are the travel writers of the rock world, chronicling their astounding journeys through the crust." (p. 33)
I love how she gives anthropomorphic personalities to rocks. This is her great talent as a writer. Along similar lines as the quote above, she later compares mafic to felsic igneous rocks: "A mafic rock like basalt generally has tales to tell of life in the mantle, while for a felsic rock like granite, whose progenitors were themselves crustal, the mantle is a nearly forgotten ancestral homeland." (p. 43)
She has a great analogy for radioactive decay, using "parent" and "daughter" as part of the analogy itself: A "magnanimous parent who transfers half of his savings to his daughter each year on her birthday." Each year, the parent has less money, but the daughter's wealth has grown by exactly that same amount. "At any time, an external auditor could determine the age of the girl - the number of years the parent had been giving money to her - by finding the ratio of the amount in the daughter's account to the amount in the father's account." (p. 58) Clever!
She gives some great comparisons for viscosity, including glacial ice, basaltic lava, rhyolitic lava, motor oil, water at room temperature, and blood (which she helpfully reminds us is thicker than water).
Chapter 3 concludes with a great comparison between the small and the large: "...Small phenomena can wield surprising power: A trivial deviation from sphericity causes the entire planet to wobble, raindrops and tiny flaws in minerals bring down mountains, trace gases in the air govern climate, and microbes modulate the atmosphere. Perhaps the greatest challenge we face in attempting to fathom the Earth is to gain a proper sense of our own size as a human species; like spoiled children, we routinely overstimate our importance on the planet but underestimate the destructiveness of our self-absorption." (p.98)
Criticism:
- The "currently accepted geologic timescale" at the beginning of the book includes "Tertiary," with no mention of Paleogene or Neogene. Frowny face.
- She attributes John Playfair's quote about being "giddy from peering into the abyss of time" directly to James Hutton. Tragically, Hutton was never so eloquent himself.
Labels: analogies, books, geologists, geology
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Icy volcanic breccia
This is beautiful:
That's an image by Chris Waythomas of the USGS, hosted by the Alaska Volcano Observatory website. It shows a cutbank (river-eroded alluvium deposit) along Rust Slough, south of the Drift River Oil Terminal, northeast of Redoubt Volcano. The sediments exposed were deposited on March 22, 2009 by a lahar (volcanic mudflow). The lahar deposit is 2.5 m thick. When I saw this image tonight (as I was searching for another shot), I was particularly struck by the subrounded clasts of ice in the mud. Here is ice acting the part that chunks of rock usually play. Technically, ice is a mineral, and so these chunks are sedimentary clasts much like any other... But to me there's something distinctly different about seeing ice cobbles and pebbles included in a sedimentary deposit. On a planet as warm as Earth, this sort of thing isn't likely to be preserved in the geologic record. It would melt! ...And that gets me thinking about other planets and planet-like objects, like Titan. The Huygens probe took pictures of sedimentary clasts, presumably of ice, on the surface of that moon. Other cold locations could have CO2 ice ("dry ice"): That makes for the sort of rock specimen that would be really difficult to keep on your shelf as a 'deskcrop'...
An additional thought: how could the former presence of icy clasts have influenced the geologic record? Perhaps ice clasts were an integral part of a deposit as it was laid down... but then later the ice melts away. How could we detect and control for this?
That's an image by Chris Waythomas of the USGS, hosted by the Alaska Volcano Observatory website. It shows a cutbank (river-eroded alluvium deposit) along Rust Slough, south of the Drift River Oil Terminal, northeast of Redoubt Volcano. The sediments exposed were deposited on March 22, 2009 by a lahar (volcanic mudflow). The lahar deposit is 2.5 m thick. When I saw this image tonight (as I was searching for another shot), I was particularly struck by the subrounded clasts of ice in the mud. Here is ice acting the part that chunks of rock usually play. Technically, ice is a mineral, and so these chunks are sedimentary clasts much like any other... But to me there's something distinctly different about seeing ice cobbles and pebbles included in a sedimentary deposit. On a planet as warm as Earth, this sort of thing isn't likely to be preserved in the geologic record. It would melt! ...And that gets me thinking about other planets and planet-like objects, like Titan. The Huygens probe took pictures of sedimentary clasts, presumably of ice, on the surface of that moon. Other cold locations could have CO2 ice ("dry ice"): That makes for the sort of rock specimen that would be really difficult to keep on your shelf as a 'deskcrop'...An additional thought: how could the former presence of icy clasts have influenced the geologic record? Perhaps ice clasts were an integral part of a deposit as it was laid down... but then later the ice melts away. How could we detect and control for this?
Labels: alaska, CO2, ice, satellite imagery, sediment, volcano
Sierra Nevada geologic map repository
Wow. Here's a great resource for those who do research in the Sierras, or the geologically-inclined visitor. Making this available online is a terrific public service by Allen Glazner and Mike Oksin at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Via Geology News' automated reposting of "geology" items from del.icio.us.
Via Geology News' automated reposting of "geology" items from del.icio.us.
Labels: california, mountains

